Morganti v. Astrue

Filing 23

ORDER granting 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for a Second Extension of Time for Defendant to File Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Astrue. Reset Deadlines as to 17 First MOTION for Summary Judgment or remand and proposed order. Responses due by 3/28/2013. Cross Motions due by 3/28/2013. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/12/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2013)

1

6

MELINDA L. HAAG, CSBN 132612
United States Attorney
GRACE M. KIM, SBN IL 6203390
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
DAVID LERCH, CA SBN 229411
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Defendant

2
3
4
5

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
DOUGLAS MORGANTI,
12
13
14
15
16
17

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
______________________________)

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-03511-CRB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO FILE A
CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

18
19
20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval

21

of the Court, that Defendant shall have a second 28-day extension of time, from February28, 2013, until

22

March 28, 2013 in which to file his Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion for

23

Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

24
25
26
27
28

This request is made as a result of a realignment of work in the office of the undersigned counsel
of record for the Defendant and is not intended to cause intentional delay.
The parties further stipulate the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

1
2

Respectfully submitted,

3
4

Dated: February 11, 2013

By:

5

s/ Pamela Vincent*
[*as e-authorized via email]
PAMELA VINCENT,
Attorney for Plaintiff

6
7
8

Dated: February 11, 2013

MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney

9
By:

10
11

s/ David Lerch
DAVID LERCH
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

12
13
ORDER
14
15

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

16

Dated February 12, 2013

17

___________________
THE HONORABLE CHARLES BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Stip. and Proposed order for Extension, C-12-3511-CRB

2