Fujifilm Corporation v. Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 62

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL CHARTS FOR PLAINTIFF'S PATENT L.R. 3-1 DISCLOSURES re 61 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/09/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

DANIEL JOHNSON, JR. (SBN 57409)
RITA E. TAUTKUS (SBN 162090)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.442.1001
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
NATHAN MCCUTCHEON (pro hac vice)
MARK W. TAYLOR (pro hac vice)
BRADFORD A. CANGRO (pro hac vice)
DAE GUNN JEI (pro hac vice)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.739.3001
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

A. JAMES ISBESTER (SBN 129820)
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile: 415.576.0300
[e-mail]
JORDAN TRENT JONES (SBN 166600)
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.326.2422
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff
FUJIFILM CORPORATION

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

FUJIFILM CORPORATION, a Japanese
Corporation,
Plaintiff,

20
21
22

v.
MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, a
Delaware Limited Liability Company,

23

Case No. C 12-03587 WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING AMENDED AND
SUPPLEMENTAL CHARTS FOR
PLAINTIFF’S PATENT L.R. 3-1
DISCLOSURES

Defendant.

24
25
26
27
28
DB1/ 75837694.5

STIP. AND ORDER RE: AMENDED AND
SUPPLEMENTAL CHARTS FOR PLTF’S
PATENT L.R. 3-1 DISCLOSURES CASE NO.
C 12-03587 WHO

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiff Fujifilm Corporation (“Fujifilm”) and Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC
(“Motorola”) (collectively, the “parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby
stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, the Local Rules of Practice for Patent Cases before the United States District
Court for the Northern District of California (“Local Patent Rules”) require a party claiming
patent infringement to serve claim charts identifying where the asserted patent claims’ limitations
are found within the accused instrumentalities (Patent L.R. 3-1(c)) no later than 14 days after the
Initial Case Management Conference;
WHEREAS, Fujifilm served its Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement
Contentions Pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-1, to which claim charts pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-1(c)
were attached, on February 22, 2013;
WHEREAS, Motorola disputed the sufficiency of Fujifilm’s original contentions and
Fujifilm disputed the sufficiency of Motorola’s initial document productions;
WHEREAS, pursuant to a number of meet and confers between the parties conducted in
an effort to resolve the disputes, Fujifilm agreed to amend and supplement its Patent L.R. 3-1
disclosures and Motorola agreed to supplement its document productions.
WHEREAS, the Local Patent Rules provide that amendment of infringement contentions
may only be made by order of the Court upon a timely motion (Patent L.R. 3-6);
THEREFOR, pursuant to the parties’ agreement, and in an effort to avoid unnecessary
motions practice, Fujifilm provided Motorola with amended and supplemental claim charts for
Fujifilm’s Infringement Contentions on September 26, 2013.
While the parties agreed and hereby stipulate to allow Fujifilm to amend its Patent L.R.
3-1 disclosures without a motion pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-6, nothing herein shall be deemed to
waive any rights Motorola may have to object to the sufficiency of Fujifilm’s Amended and
Supplemental Infringement Contentions and nothing herein shall be deemed to waive any right
Fujifilm may have to object to the sufficiency of Motorola’s supplemental document productions.

28
1
DB1/ 75837694.5

STIP. AND ORDER RE: AMENDED AND
SUPPLEMENTAL CHARTS FOR PLTF’S
PATENT L.R. 3-1 DISCLOSURES CASE NO.
C 12-03587 WHO

1

Dated: October 7, 2013

2

Respectfully submitted,
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

3
4

By /s/ Rita E. Tautkus
RITA E. TAUTKUS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FUJIFILM CORPORATION

5
6
7

Dated: October 7, 2013

Respectfully submitted,
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

8
9

By /s/ Jordan Trent Jones
JORDAN TRENT JONES
Attorneys for Defendant
MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC

10
11
12
13

FILER’S ATTESTATION

14

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Rita E. Tautkus, attest that

15

concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from the other signatory. I declare

16

under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true

17

and correct. Executed this 7th day of October 2013, at San Francisco, California.

18
19

/s/ Rita E. Tautkus
Rita E. Tautkus

20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

DATED: October 9, 2013

WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28
2
DB1/ 75837694.5

STIP. AND ORDER RE: AMENDED AND
SUPPLEMENTAL CHARTS FOR PLTF’S
PATENT L.R. 3-1 DISCLOSURES CASE NO.
C 12-03587 WHO