Petersen et al v. Browne et al
Filing
63
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' APRIL 15, 2013 FILING (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 4/18/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
RYAN PETERSEN, MICHAEL P. PETERSEN,
and RANDI PETERSEN
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
No. C 12-3607 SI
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ APRIL 15,
2013 FILING
v.
MILDRED BROWNE, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
On April 15, 2013, plaintiffs filed a “Clarification Declaration of Randi Petersen.” Dkt. 62.
18
Earlier that same day, the Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended complaint and
19
entered judgment against plaintiffs. Dkts. 58, 59. Ms. Petersen’s declaration states, inter alia, that
20
“PLAINTIFFS believe the facts of this case appear to invalidate the Court’s 1/16/13 res judicata
21
dismissal . . . .” Dkt. 62 at 2:3-4. In an order filed January 16, 2013, the Court dismissed many of
22
plaintiffs’ claims as barred by res judicata, for not stating a cause of action, or as incomprehensible, and
23
granted leave to amend the RICO claim. Dkt. 43. In an order filed March 6, 2013, the Court denied
24
plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the January 16, 2013 order. Dkt. 54.
25
The April 15, 2013 declaration repeats the same arguments plaintiffs have raised throughout this
26
lawsuit. To the extent the April 15, 2013 declaration is construed as a motion for reconsideration of the
27
January 16, 2013 order, the motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the March 6, 2013 order. To
28
the extent the declaration was filed in opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended
1
complaint, the declaration is untimely. Finally, to the extent the April 15, 2013 filing is construed as
2
a motion to alter or amend the Court’s judgment entered earlier that day, the motion is DENIED.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated: April 18, 2013
6
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?