Petersen et al v. Browne et al

Filing 63

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' APRIL 15, 2013 FILING (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 4/18/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 RYAN PETERSEN, MICHAEL P. PETERSEN, and RANDI PETERSEN Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 No. C 12-3607 SI ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ APRIL 15, 2013 FILING v. MILDRED BROWNE, et al., Defendants. / 16 17 On April 15, 2013, plaintiffs filed a “Clarification Declaration of Randi Petersen.” Dkt. 62. 18 Earlier that same day, the Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended complaint and 19 entered judgment against plaintiffs. Dkts. 58, 59. Ms. Petersen’s declaration states, inter alia, that 20 “PLAINTIFFS believe the facts of this case appear to invalidate the Court’s 1/16/13 res judicata 21 dismissal . . . .” Dkt. 62 at 2:3-4. In an order filed January 16, 2013, the Court dismissed many of 22 plaintiffs’ claims as barred by res judicata, for not stating a cause of action, or as incomprehensible, and 23 granted leave to amend the RICO claim. Dkt. 43. In an order filed March 6, 2013, the Court denied 24 plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the January 16, 2013 order. Dkt. 54. 25 The April 15, 2013 declaration repeats the same arguments plaintiffs have raised throughout this 26 lawsuit. To the extent the April 15, 2013 declaration is construed as a motion for reconsideration of the 27 January 16, 2013 order, the motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the March 6, 2013 order. To 28 the extent the declaration was filed in opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended 1 complaint, the declaration is untimely. Finally, to the extent the April 15, 2013 filing is construed as 2 a motion to alter or amend the Court’s judgment entered earlier that day, the motion is DENIED. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: April 18, 2013 6 SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?