Archuleta v. Federal Express Corporation

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/6/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2013)

Case3:12-cv-03614-RS Document28 Filedl2/18/12 Pagel of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMANDA ARCHULETA
CASE NO. C 12-03614 RS

Plaintiffs),

v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

FEDERAL EXPRESS
CORPORATION

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s).

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:

[J
Q

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

1/1

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet theirneeds than any otherform ofADR mustparticipate in an
ADR phone conference and may notfile thisform. Theymust insteadfile a Notice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Swale Process:

Private ADR.(please identify process andprovider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

I |

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrom the date ofthe order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

(/]

other requested deadline March 13, 2013(Mcdiation deadline per court order)

Dated: 12/18/12

Kathryn Sara Landman
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: 12/18/12

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

David S. Wilson, III
Attorney for Defendant