Natividad et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 150

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT PARTRICK LYMAN & ASSOCIATES LLC SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Show Cause Response due by 10/15/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/30/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
10
11
Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

GLORIA Q. NATIVIDAD, et al.,
v.

Plaintiffs,

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

Case No.: C12-3646 JSC

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT
PARTRICK LYMAN & ASSOCIATES LLC
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE

Defendant Patrick Lyman & Associates LLC filed a motion to dismiss the third amended

complaint on July 16, 2013. (Dkt. No. 132.) Prior to the hearing on the motion to dismiss,

Defendant filed a notice that it had entered a written settlement agreement with Plaintiffs. (Dkt.
No. 144.) The Notice stated that Plaintiffs were required to file a dismissal with the Court by

August 20, 2013. As of the date of this Order, however, no dismissal has been filed. Accordingly,
Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause why their claims against Defendant Patrick Lyman &

Associates LLC should not be dismissed with prejudice. In particular, if Plaintiffs wish to contest
dismissal of those claims they shall file a written response on or before October 15, 2013.

Plaintiffs are warned that if no written response is filed, the Court will dismiss the claims with
prejudice in accordance with the Notice of Settlement.

1
2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

Dated: September 30, 2013

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2