Natividad et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 38

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/26/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 GLORIA Q. NATIVIDAD, et al., Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 Plaintiffs, Case No.: C12-3646 JSC ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE v. 14 15 16 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. 17 18 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers this 19 foreclosure-related action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Unit for a telephone 20 conference to assess this case’s suitability for mediation or a settlement conference. Counsel for 21 Plaintiffs and each of the Defendants shall participate in the telephone conference, to be 22 scheduled by the ADR Unit, as soon as possible but not later than October 11, 2012. 23 24 25 Counsel shall be prepared to discuss the following: (1) Identification and description of claims and alleged defects in loan origination and foreclosure procedures. 26 (2) Prospects for further loan modification. 27 (3) Prospects for settlement. 28 (4) Identification of those Defendants who should attend any settlement conference 1 in light of the allegations as to the current ownership of Plaintiffs’ loan. 2 3 The Parties need not submit written materials to the ADR Unit for the telephone conference. 4 In preparation for the telephone conference, counsel for Plaintiffs shall do the following: 5 (1) Review the loan documents and investigate the claims to determine whether they have merit. 6 7 (2) If Plaintiffs are seeking a loan modification to resolve all or some of the claims, 8 Plaintiffs shall prepare a current, accurate financial statement and gather all of the 9 information and documents customarily needed to support a loan modification 10 request. Further, Plaintiffs shall immediately notify the appropriate Defendants’ 11 counsel of the request for a loan modification. Northern District of California United States District Court 12 (3) Provide counsel for Defendants with information necessary to evaluate the prospects 13 for loan modification, in the form of a financial statement, worksheet or application 14 customarily used by financial institutions. 15 16 In preparation for the telephone conference, counsel for Defendants shall do the following: 17 (1) If Defendants are unwilling or unable to do a loan modification after receiving notice 18 of Plaintiffs’ request, counsel for Defendants shall promptly notify Plaintiffs to that 19 effect. 20 21 22 (2) Arrange for a representative of each Defendant with full settlement authority to participate in the telephone conference. The ADR unit will notify parties of the date and time the telephone conference will be 23 held. After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the Court of its recommendation 24 for further ADR proceedings. In the meantime, the October 4, 2012 hearing on Defendants’ 25 motions to dismiss and to strike claims is VACATED. The Court will reschedule the hearing after 26 the ADR assessment and/or ADR proceedings are complete, if necessary. 27 28 2 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________________ Dated: September 26, 2012 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?