Natividad et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 45

ORDER granting 44 Request To Be Excused From Client Participation by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. At The October 3, 2012 ADR Teleconference filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/2/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 MARY KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203) NATILEE S. RIEDMAN (State Bar No. 257871) 2 nsr@severson.com SEVERSON & WERSON 3 A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 5 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 6 Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA— SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 GLORIA Q. NATIVIDAD; FELICISIMO M. NATIVIDAD, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; FIRST 15 AMERICAN LOANSTAR SERVICES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, DBA 16 FIRST AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVICING SOLUTIONS, LLC and FIRST AMERICAN 17 LOANSTAR TRUSTEE SERVICES, LLC; NEWBURY PLACE REO III, LLC.; BSI 18 FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; and all persons or entities unknown claiming any legal 19 or equitable right, title, estate, lien or interest in the property described in this Complaint 20 adverse to Plaintiffs’ title thereto, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 Case No. CV 12-03646-JSC REQUEST TO BE EXCUSED FROM CLIENT PARTICIPATION BY WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AT THE OCTOBER 3, 2012 ADR TELECONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Date: October 3, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m. Judge: Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley Action Filed: Trial Date: May 2, 2012 None Set 23 24 On September 26, 2012, the Court in the above-captioned action issued an order, referring 25 the case to the ADR unit for an assessment telephone conference. (See docket entry number 26 38.) In the September 26, 2012 order, the Court requested that the defendants arrange for a 27 representative to participate in the telephone conference, for the purpose of discussing the 28 possibility of another loan modification review. (Id.) On or around September 27, 2012, the ADR CV 12-03646-JSC REQUEST TO BE EXCUSED FROM CLIENT PARTICIPATION BY WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AT THE OCTOBER 3, 2012 ADR TELECONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 55002.0045/2409996.1 1 department issued a scheduling notice, setting an ADR conference call for October 3, 2012. (See 2 docket entry number 39.) 3 As detailed further in the motion to dismiss filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ( “Wells 4 Fargo Wells Fargo does not have any current relationship to the loan that is the subject matter of ”), 5 this litigation. Thus, Wells Fargo would be unable to meaningfully participate in any discussions 6 concerning the possibility of a loan modification. Accordingly, Wells Fargo respectfully requests 7 that the Court allow Wells Fargo to be excused from producing a client representative at the 8 October 3, 2012 ADR telephone conference. Counsel for Wells Fargo, of course, would happily 9 participate and will be fully apprised of the case status and any settlement position on the part of 10 Wells Fargo. 11 12 DATED: October 2, 2012 13 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 14 By: 15 /s/ Natilee S. Riedman Natilee S. Riedman 16 Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CV 12-03646-JSC 2 REQUEST TO BE EXCUSED FROM CLIENT PARTICIPATION BY WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AT THE OCTOBER 3, 2012 ADR TELECONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 55002.0045/2409996.1 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Having reviewed the request by Wells Fargo, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby 3 ORDERS that Wells Fargo shall be excused from producing a client representative at the October 4 3, 2012 ADR conference call. Counsel for Wells Fargo shall participate. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. October 2 6 DATED: _______________, 2012 7 8 United States District Court Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CV 12-03646-JSC REQUEST TO BE EXCUSED FROM CLIENT PARTICIPATION BY WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AT THE OCTOBER 3, 2012 ADR TELECONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 55002.0045/2409996.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?