Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Commerce

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER on Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/10/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2012)

1

Mark Rumold (SBN 279060)
[e-mail]

2

Jennifer Lynch (SBN 240701)
[e-mail]
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Attorney for Plaintiff
Electronic Frontier Foundation
MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
ALEX G. TSE (CSBN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
VICTORIA R. CARRADERO (CABN 217885)
Assistant United States Attorney
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
Telephone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

13
14

Attorneys for Federal Defendant
United States Department of Commerce

15
16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19
20

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION,

21
22
23
24
25
26

Plaintiff,

v.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
Defendant.

)
) Case No. 3:12-cv-3683-TEH
)
)
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON
) SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING
) SCHEDULE
)
) Place: Courtroom 12, 19th Floor
) Judge: Hon. Thelton E. Henderson
)
)
)
)

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 12-3683 TEH

Plaintiff Electronic Frontier Foundation (“EFF”) and Federal Defendant the United States

1
2

Department of Commerce hereby stipulate as follows and request that the Court order the same.
The parties previously stipulated and the court ordered (see Dkt No. 17) the following

3
4

briefing schedule:

5

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment due: January 21, 2013.

6

Plaintiff’s combined Opposition to Defendant’s Motion/Cross-Motion for Summary

7

Judgment due: February 20, 2013.
Defendant’s combined Opposition to Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion/Reply brief due: March 22,

8
9

2013.

10

Plaintiff’s Reply brief in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment due: April 5, 2013.

11

Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment: April 29, 2013.

12

The parties have recently learned that the due date for defendant’s motion – January 21 – is

13

a federal holiday. The court and defendant’s and its counsel’s offices are closed. Accordingly, the

14

parties hereby stipulate that defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be due on January 22,

15

2013. The parties further stipulate that all other briefing dates remain the same.

16

SO STIPULATED.

17

DATED: December 7, 2012

18

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Mark Rumold

21

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
Mark Rumold, Esq.
454 Shotwell Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

22

Attorney for Plaintiff

23

MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney

19
20

24
25
26

_/s/ Victoria R. Carradero
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Federal Defendant

27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 12-3683 TEH

1
2
3
4
5
6

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, Victoria R. Carradero, attest that I have obtained the concurrence of Mark Rumold,
Counsel for Plaintiff, in the filing of this document.
Executed on December 7, 2012, in San Francisco, California.
/s/ Victoria R. Carradero
Victoria R. Carradero

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 12-3683 TEH

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The due date for defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be continued to January

2
22, 2013. All other briefing dates remain the same.
3

J

RT

9

H

ER

10
11

FO

He
elton E.
udge Th

R NIA

nderson

NO

8

___________________________________
The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson
United States District Court Judge

LI

7

10
DATE: December___, 2012

A

6

UNIT
ED

5

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

4

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 12-3683 TEH

C