Gradillas et al v. Lincoln General Insurance Company et al

Filing 148

ORDER re 147 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendants Who Have Not Yet Appeared in the Action filed by Lillian Gradillas. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/23/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Scott A. Brown, SBN 177099 David M. Poore, SBN 192541 BROWN | POORE LLP 1350 Treat Blvd., Suite 420 Walnut Creek, California 94597 Telephone: (925) 943-1166 dpoore@bplegalgroup.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs LILLIAN and CHRIS GRADILLAS 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 LILLIAN GRADILLAS; CHRIS GRADILLAS, individually and as assignees of KENNETH NWADIKI, JR. dba AMERICA BUS LINE, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ALL DEFENDANTS, OTHER THAN DEFENDANT LINCOLN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AND ORDER [F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)] v. LINCOLN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; PRO INSURANCE SOLUTION LIMITED; PRO IS, INC. (DOE 1); WALSHIRE ASSURANCE COMPANY (DOE 2); KINGSWAY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. (DOE 3); TAWA, PLC (DOE 4); LGIC HOLDINGS (DOE 5); KINGSWAY AMERICA, INC. (DOE 6); and DOES 7 through 10, 21 22 Case No. 3:12-cv-03697 CRB Defendants. Courtroom 6, 17th Floor Action Filed: February 23, 2012 Trial Date: None 1 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiffs LILLIAN and CHRIS GRADILLAS hereby 2 dismiss with prejudice the following Defendants, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil 3 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i): 4 PRO INSURANCE SOLUTION LIMITED; PRO IS, INC. (DOE 1); WALSHIRE 5 ASSURANCE COMPANY (DOE 2); KINGSWAY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. (DOE 3); 6 TAWA, PLC (DOE 4); LGIC HOLDINGS (DOE 5); and KINGSWAY AMERICA, INC. (DOE 7 6) (collectively, “Dismissed Defendants”). 8 This dismissal does not affect Defendant LINCOLN GENERAL INSURANCE 9 COMPANY (In Liquidation) (“Lincoln General”), and Defendant Lincoln General will remain a 10 party to this litigation until the settlement consideration is transferred to Plaintiffs, in accordance 11 with the parties’ settlement agreement. 12 There exists good cause in which to dismiss these Defendants pursuant to Rule 13 41(a)(1)(A)(i), as, after many years, the Plaintiffs and Lincoln General have reached settlement 14 that will dispose of the litigation without any further participation required by Dismissed 15 Defendants, and Plaintiffs named Dismissed Defendants in this action as alleged alter-egos of 16 Defendant Lincoln General. The Dismissed Defendants have not appeared in this action, and 17 they were previously dismissed without prejudice, when Defendant Lincoln General appealed the 18 grant of partial summary judgment in this matter to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. As 19 Plaintiffs and Lincoln General have now reached a full settlement in this matter, the Dismissed 20 Defendants should be dismissed, with prejudice, at this time, with each party bearing its own 21 costs and attorney’s fees. 22 23 Dated: March 21, 2016 BROWN | POORE LLP 24 25 26 __//s// David M. Poore____________________ DAVID M. POORE Attorneys for Plaintiffs LILLIAN & CHRIS GRADILLAS 27 28 1 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ALTER-EGO DEFENANTS WHO HAVE YET TO APPEAR IN THE ACTION Gradillas v. Lincoln General Ins. Co., et al, Case No. 3:12-CV-03697 CRB 1 2 3 ORDER 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following Defendants are hereby dismissed from this action with prejudice: PRO INSURANCE SOLUTION LIMITED; PRO IS, INC. (DOE 1); WALSHIRE ASSURANCE COMPANY (DOE 2); KINGSWAY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. (DOE 3); TAWA, PLC (DOE 4); LGIC HOLDINGS (DOE 5); and KINGSWAY AMERICA, INC. (DOE 6). Each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees. SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: March 23, 2015 ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ALTER-EGO DEFENANTS WHO HAVE YET TO APPEAR IN THE ACTION Gradillas v. Lincoln General Ins. Co., et al, Case No. 3:12-CV-03697 CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?