Gradillas et al v. Lincoln General Insurance Company et al
Filing
148
ORDER re 147 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendants Who Have Not Yet Appeared in the Action filed by Lillian Gradillas. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/23/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scott A. Brown, SBN 177099
David M. Poore, SBN 192541
BROWN | POORE LLP
1350 Treat Blvd., Suite 420
Walnut Creek, California 94597
Telephone:
(925) 943-1166
dpoore@bplegalgroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LILLIAN and CHRIS GRADILLAS
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
LILLIAN GRADILLAS; CHRIS
GRADILLAS, individually and as assignees of
KENNETH NWADIKI, JR. dba AMERICA
BUS LINE,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ALL
DEFENDANTS, OTHER THAN
DEFENDANT LINCOLN GENERAL
INSURANCE COMPANY, AND ORDER
[F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)]
v.
LINCOLN GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY; PRO INSURANCE SOLUTION
LIMITED; PRO IS, INC. (DOE 1);
WALSHIRE ASSURANCE COMPANY
(DOE 2); KINGSWAY FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC. (DOE 3); TAWA, PLC
(DOE 4); LGIC HOLDINGS (DOE 5);
KINGSWAY AMERICA, INC. (DOE 6); and
DOES 7 through 10,
21
22
Case No. 3:12-cv-03697 CRB
Defendants.
Courtroom 6, 17th Floor
Action Filed: February 23, 2012
Trial Date: None
1
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiffs LILLIAN and CHRIS GRADILLAS hereby
2
dismiss with prejudice the following Defendants, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil
3
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i):
4
PRO INSURANCE SOLUTION LIMITED; PRO IS, INC. (DOE 1); WALSHIRE
5
ASSURANCE COMPANY (DOE 2); KINGSWAY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. (DOE 3);
6
TAWA, PLC (DOE 4); LGIC HOLDINGS (DOE 5); and KINGSWAY AMERICA, INC. (DOE
7
6) (collectively, “Dismissed Defendants”).
8
This dismissal does not affect Defendant LINCOLN GENERAL INSURANCE
9
COMPANY (In Liquidation) (“Lincoln General”), and Defendant Lincoln General will remain a
10
party to this litigation until the settlement consideration is transferred to Plaintiffs, in accordance
11
with the parties’ settlement agreement.
12
There exists good cause in which to dismiss these Defendants pursuant to Rule
13
41(a)(1)(A)(i), as, after many years, the Plaintiffs and Lincoln General have reached settlement
14
that will dispose of the litigation without any further participation required by Dismissed
15
Defendants, and Plaintiffs named Dismissed Defendants in this action as alleged alter-egos of
16
Defendant Lincoln General. The Dismissed Defendants have not appeared in this action, and
17
they were previously dismissed without prejudice, when Defendant Lincoln General appealed the
18
grant of partial summary judgment in this matter to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. As
19
Plaintiffs and Lincoln General have now reached a full settlement in this matter, the Dismissed
20
Defendants should be dismissed, with prejudice, at this time, with each party bearing its own
21
costs and attorney’s fees.
22
23
Dated: March 21, 2016
BROWN | POORE LLP
24
25
26
__//s// David M. Poore____________________
DAVID M. POORE
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LILLIAN & CHRIS GRADILLAS
27
28
1
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ALTER-EGO DEFENANTS WHO HAVE YET TO APPEAR IN THE ACTION
Gradillas v. Lincoln General Ins. Co., et al, Case No. 3:12-CV-03697 CRB
1
2
3
ORDER
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following Defendants are hereby dismissed from this
action with prejudice: PRO INSURANCE SOLUTION LIMITED; PRO IS, INC. (DOE 1);
WALSHIRE ASSURANCE COMPANY (DOE 2); KINGSWAY FINANCIAL SERVICES,
INC. (DOE 3); TAWA, PLC (DOE 4); LGIC HOLDINGS (DOE 5); and KINGSWAY
AMERICA, INC. (DOE 6). Each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.
SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: March 23, 2015
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ALTER-EGO DEFENANTS WHO HAVE YET TO APPEAR IN THE ACTION
Gradillas v. Lincoln General Ins. Co., et al, Case No. 3:12-CV-03697 CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?