LaFreniere v. Prada U.S.A. Corporation

Filing 39

ORDER REGARDING COMMUNICATION WITH COURT. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 3/25/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ZAKARIAH LAFRENIERE, 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Plaintiff, No. C-12-3701-EDL ORDER REGARDING COMMUNICATION WITH COURT v. PRADA U.S.A. CORP., 11 Defendant. 12 13 This Court is informed that pro se Plaintiff Zakariah LaFreniere has recently left voice 14 15 mail messages for this Court’s Courtroom Deputy attempting to discuss substantive issues relating 16 to the case.1 It is improper for Plaintiff to attempt such ex parte communications with Court staff, 17 and neither the Court nor its staff will respond to any such communications. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mr. LaFreniere may no longer 18 19 communicate with the Court by phone and all future communications to the Court shall be in 20 writing, filed in this action with the Clerk of the Court. Plaintiff is warned that any future improper 21 attempts at improper ex parte communication may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal 22 of this action. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: March 25, 2013 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Chief Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff’s most recent communication was a general inquiry about his obligation to verify discovery responses. Plaintiff is advised to consult the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including among others Rules 26 and 33, to determine his verification obligations.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?