Riese v. County of Del Norte et al

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MOTION TO WITHDRAW. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/25/2013 01:30 PM; Motion Hearing set for 7/25/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/17/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Brian E. Claypool, Esq., State Bar# 134674 THE CLAYPOOL LAW FIRM 1055 East Colorado Blvd., 5th Floor Pasadena, CA 91106 (626) 240-4616 (telephone) (626) 796-9951 (fax) 4 5 6 Attorney For Plaintiff MICHAEL RIESE 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 MICHAEL RIESE 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. COUNTY OF DEL NORTE, et. al Defendants ) Case No.: CV-12-3723-RS ) ) 1. STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ) CASE MANAGEMENT ) CONFERENCE AND ) HEARING ON MOTION TO ) WITHDRAW ) 2. [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) Date: June 20, 2013 ) Time: 1:30 p.m. ) Ctrm: 3, 17th Floor Complaint Filed: July 16, 2012 19 20 21 22 23 Counsels for Defendants and Plaintiff stipulate to the following: Plaintiff’s counsel, Brian E. Claypool, was ordered not to fly for 14 days by his doctor due to a severe blockage and inflammation in both of his ear canals. Over the past 24 25 26 2 weeks since returning on a flight from Austin, Mr. Claypool’s had been blocked causing extreme fatigue, headaches, congestion and ear pain. When he consulted with an 27 28 ENT in Pasadena nearly 10 days ago he was prescribed a steroid to reduce inflammation - 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC AND HEARING ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 2 in the tubes leading to his ear drums, but the ENT failed to diagnose an upper respiratory infection which was causing the inflamed congestion. Upon consulting a second ENT 3 4 5 specialist on June 10, Mr. Claypool was diagnosed with a serious upper respiratory infection and ordered a steroid shot and an antibiotic. The ENT prescribed a 10 day 6 7 8 9 regimen of Penicillin in hope of eradicating infection and reducing swelling in the tubes leading to my ears and advised against flying for at least 14 days and suggested rest. Consequently, Mr. Claypool corresponded with all of defendants’ counsel to 10 11 regarding his condition and a continuance to the CMC and hearing. The parties have 12 agreed to stipulate to a short continuance of the June 20, 2013 hearing date to July 25, 13 14 15 16 2013, or, in the alternative, a date that is convenient for the Court that is at least two weeks in the future. All parties respectfully request the court issue an order continuing the initial Case 17 18 Management Conference and hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw to July 25, 2013, 19 or, in the alternative to a date that is convenient to the Court that is at least two weeks in 20 21 the future. 22 23 DATED: June 15, 2013 THE CLAYPOOL LAW FIRM 24 25 26 /s/ Brian E. Claypool Brian E. Claypool Attorney for Plaintiff 27 28 - 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC AND HEARING ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 DATED: June 15, 2013 PATTON, WOLAN, CARLISE, LLP 2 /s/ Steven C. Wolan Steven C. Wolan Attorney for Defendant County of Del Norte and Richard Griffin 3 4 5 6 DATED: June 15, 2013 HUNT & JEPPSON, LLP 7 8 9 10 11 /s/ Jeremy B. Price Jeremy B. Price Attorney for Defendants Crescent City, Crescent City Police Department, Keith Doyle, & Doug Plack 12 13 DATED: June 15, 2013 BRADLEY, CURLEY, ASIANO, BARRABEE, ABEL, & KOWALSKI 14 15 16 17 /s/ Ann M. Asiano Ann M. Asiano Attorney for Defendant Jon Alexander 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC AND HEARING ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND PROPOSED ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 4 Management Conference and hearing on Motion to Withdraw be continued from 5 June 20, 2013 to July 25, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. 6 7 DATED: 6/17/13 8 9 HON. RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 4 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC AND HEARING ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND PROPOSED ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?