Riese v. County of Del Norte et al

Filing 71

ORDER re 62 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint. In accordance with Local Rule 7-2(a), Plaintiffs Motion shall be heard on September 25, 2013. Defendants Opposition shall be due September 4, 2013 and Plaintiffs Reply shall be due September 11, 2013. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/19/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL RIESE, Case No. 12-cv-03723-WHO Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 COUNTY OF DEL NORTE, et al., Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 62 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 12 13 Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint on August 6, 2013 (the 14 “Motion”). Dkt. No. 62. Plaintiff’s Motion was noticed for hearing 22 days later, on August 28, 15 2013, in violation of Local Rule 7-2(a), which requires that all motions must be noticed for 16 hearing “not less than 35 days after service of the motion.” The August 28, 2013 hearing on the 17 Motion is hereby vacated. 18 Plaintiff is reminded to adhere to the Local Rules of the Court. In accordance with Local 19 Rule 7-2(a), Plaintiff’s Motion shall be heard on September 25, 2013. Defendants’ Opposition 20 shall be due September 4, 2013 and Plaintiff’s Reply shall be due September 11, 2013. 21 The two pending SLAPP motions in this matter remain set for hearing on August 28, 2013. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 19, 2013 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?