Riese v. County of Del Norte et al

Filing 81

STIPULATION AND ORDER to continue 62 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint. Motion Hearing reset for 10/9/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/11/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Steven C. Wolan (State Bar No. 56237)
Clariza C. Garcia (State Bar No. 189918)
PATTONWOLANCARLISE, LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1350
Oakland, CA 94612-3582
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF DEL NORTE and
DEPUTY GRIFFIN

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

MICHAEL RIESE, an individual,

13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.

Case No.: CV 12-3723 WHO
1.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND
2. ORDER

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

COUNTY OF DEL NORTE; CRESCENT
CITY; CRESCENT CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT; COUNTY OF DEL NORTE
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; JON
ALEXANDER; BRIAN NEWMAN;
RICHARD GRIFFIN; BOB BARBER; KEITH
DOYLE; DOUG PLACK, and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
Defendants.

DATE: September 25, 2013
TIME: 2:00 p.m.
DEPT: Courtroom 2, 17th Floor

Complaint Filed: July 16, 2012

22
23
24

Counsels for Defendants and Plaintiff stipulate to the following:

25

Defendants County of Del Norte and Deputy Griffin’s counsel, Steven C. Wolan and Clariza

26

C. Garcia, are both unavailable on September 25, 2013 due to calendar conflicts on both Mr. Wolan’s

27
28
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND
(Case No. CV 12-3723 WHO)
1

1

and Ms. Garcia’s calendar. Consequently, the parties have agreed to stipulate to a short 13 day

2

continuance of the September 25, 2013 hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend to October 8, 2013.

3

All parties respectfully request the court issue an order continuing the hearing on Plaintiff’s

4

Motion to Amend to October 8, 2013, or in the alternative to a date convenient to the Court that is at

5

least two weeks in the future.
Dated: September 10, 2013

6

THE CLAYPOOL LAW FIRM

7
By: __/s/ Brian E. Claypool___________________
BRIAN E. CLAYPOOL
Attorney for Plaintiff,
MICHAEL RIESE

8
9
10
11

Dated: September 10, 2013

PATTON ♦ WOLAN ♦ CARLISE, LLP

12
13
By: __/s/ Clariza C. Garcia____________________
CLARIZA C. GARCIA
Attorney for Defendant
COUNTY OF DEL NORTE and
DEPUTY GRIFFIN

14
15
16
17
18

Dated: September 10, 2013

HUNT & JEPPSON, LLP

19
20

By: __/s/ Jeremy B. Price______________________
JEREMY B. PRICE
Attorney for Defendant
CRESCENT CITY, CRESCENT CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT, KEITH DOYLE, AND DOUG
PLACK

21

22
23
24
25

Dated: September 10, 2013

BRADLEY, CURLEY, ASIANO, BARRABEE,
ABEL & KOWALSKI

26
27
By: __/s/ Ann M. Asiano______________________
28
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND
(Case No. CV 12-3723 WHO)
2

1
2

ANN M. ASIANO
Attorney for Defendant
JON ALEXANDER

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND
(Case No. CV 12-3723 WHO)
3

1

ORDER

2
3
4

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Hearing on Plaintiff’s
Motion to Amend be continued from September 25, 2013 to October 9, 2013.

5
6
7

DATED: September 11, 2013

___________________________________
HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND
(Case No. CV 12-3723 WHO)
4