Martinez v. California Highway Patrol et al
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 28, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/28/2013: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
GREGORY SCOTT MARTINEZ,
No. C-12-3736 MMC
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al.,
On February 8, 2013, plaintiff Gregory Scott Martinez failed to appear as ordered at
a regularly-scheduled Case Management Conference. The Court, by order filed February
8, 2013, directed plaintiff to show cause, in writing and no later than February 22, 2013,
why the above-titled action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Court
advised plaintiff that if he failed to respond, the case would be dismissed pursuant to Rule
41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s order
to show cause.
Accordingly, the above-titled action is hereby DISMISSED for failure to prosecute,
pursuant to Rule 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 28, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?