Martinez v. California Highway Patrol et al

Filing 34

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 28, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/28/2013: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 GREGORY SCOTT MARTINEZ, No. C-12-3736 MMC Plaintiff, 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 13 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 / On February 8, 2013, plaintiff Gregory Scott Martinez failed to appear as ordered at a regularly-scheduled Case Management Conference. The Court, by order filed February 8, 2013, directed plaintiff to show cause, in writing and no later than February 22, 2013, why the above-titled action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Court advised plaintiff that if he failed to respond, the case would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s order to show cause. Accordingly, the above-titled action is hereby DISMISSED for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: February 28, 2013 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?