U.A. Local No. 467 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Hydra Ventures Incorporated
Filing
20
ORDER - Third Order Re Supplemental Briefing and Evidence. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/15/2013. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
U.A. LOCAL NO. 467 PENSION TRUST
FUND, et al.,
No. C-12-3746 EMC
9
Plaintiffs,
THIRD ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING AND EVIDENCE
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
HYDRA VENTURES INCORPORATED,
12
13
Defendant.
___________________________________/
14
15
Plaintiffs U.A. Local No. 467 Pension Trust Fund, U.A. Local No. 467 Health and Welfare
16
Trust Fund, Pipe Trades Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund for San Mateo County,
17
and Mike Swanson, trustee and fiduciary of the above trust funds, have filed an action to collect
18
unpaid contributions owed to certain multi-employer benefit plans from Defendant Hydra Ventures,
19
Inc., dba Cal Pacific Plumbing Systems (“Cal Pacific”), under the civil enforcement provisions of
20
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et. seq.
21
Having received an entry of default against Cal Pacific for its failure to appear or otherwise respond
22
to the summons and complaint served upon it in this matter, Plaintiffs now move for default
23
judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). See Motion for Default Judgment (Docket No. 14).
24
It is hereby ordered that Plaintiffs shall submit to the Court:
25
(1)
A copy of the following trust fund agreements referenced in paragraph 116 of the
26
Collective Bargaining Agreement (Docket No. 17-1, Ex. A):
27
(a)
28
Vacation and Holiday Fund
1
(b)
International Training Fund
2
(c)
Hiring Hall Trust Fund
3
(d)
Contract Administration Fund
4
(e)
Industry Promotion and Advertising Fund
5
(2)
A supplemental declaration from a declarant with appropriate firsthand knowledge
6
identifying the relevant page, section, and/or paragraph of each of the above trust
7
agreements that states Plaintiffs’ entitlement to collect (i) liquidated damages on
8
delinquent contributions at 10% of the amount not timely paid, and (ii) interest at
9
12% per annum on unpaid contributions and liquidated damages.
(3)
A copy of the Trades Assessment Fund Agreement, and a supplemental declaration
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
from a declarant with appropriate firsthand knowledge explaining why Defendant is
12
bound by the terms of the agreement. (See Galvan Second Supp. Decl., ¶ 3). This
13
declaration shall also identify the relevant page, section, and/or paragraph of the
14
agreement that states Plaintiffs’ entitlement to collect (i) liquidated damages on
15
delinquent contributions at 10% of the amount not timely paid, and (ii) interest at
16
12% per annum on unpaid contributions and liquidated damages.
17
(4)
A supplemental declaration from a declarant with appropriate firsthand knowledge
18
identifying the trust funds (if any) to which Defendant owes delinquent contributions
19
that are not governed by ERISA. (See Galvan Second Supp. Decl., ¶ 3). This
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
declaration shall also precisely delineate the amount of damages (if any) sought by
2
Plaintiffs in their motion for default judgment owed to these non-ERISA governed
3
funds, including all relevant unpaid contributions, liquidated damages, and interest on
4
unpaid contributions and liquidated damages.
5
Plaintiffs shall submit these materials to the Court no later than February 25, 2013.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: February 15, 2013
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?