Ramos v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company

Filing 6

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF DFT UNITED OF OMAHA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/1/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-03761-JCS Document4 Filed07/31/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 J. Russell Stedman (117130) rstedman@bargerwolen.com Brendan V. Mullan (267613) bmullan@bargerwolen.com BARGER & WOLEN LLP 650 California Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94108-2713 Telephone: (415) 434-2800 Facsimile: (415) 434-2533 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 ANTHONY RAMOS, 14 15 16 Plaintiff, vs. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 17 Defendant. 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 3:12-cv-03761-JCS STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANT UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-1(a) Complaint Filed: July 18, 2012 Judge: Hon. Joseph C. Spero 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BARGER & WOLEN LLP 650 CALIFORNIA STREET NINTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 (415) 434-2800 STIPULATION GRANTING DEFENDANT AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:12-cv-03761-JCS Case3:12-cv-03761-JCS Document4 Filed07/31/12 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 STIPULATION Plaintiff Anthony Ramos (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (“Defendant”) stipulate pursuant to L.R. 6-1(a) as follows: WHEREAS on July 18, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendants in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; 6 WHEREAS on July 19, 2012, Plaintiff served Defendant with the Complaint; 7 WHEREAS Defendant’s answer or other response to the Complaint is currently due on 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 August 9, 2012; WHEREAS Plaintiff has agreed that Defendant may have a 14-day extension to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint; WHEREAS the extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order; IT IS STIPULATED that Defendant’s answer or other responsive pleading to the Complaint is due by August 23, 2012. 15 16 Date: July 31, 2012 PILLSBURY & LEVINSON LLP 17 18 By: 19 By: Spero /s/ Brendan V. Mullan Brendan V. Mullan Attorneys for Defendant UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY C LI ER R NIA S seph C. H 25 RT 24 Judge Jo D RDERE A 23 Dated: Aug. 1, 2012 OO IT IS S NO 22 RT U O 21 Attorneys for Plaintiff ANTHONY RAMOS S DISTRICT TE C TA BARGER & WOLEN LLP FO Date: July 31, 2012 UNIT ED 20 /s/ Brian H. Kim Brian H. Kim N F D IS T IC T O R 26 27 28 BARGER & WOLEN LLP 650 CALIFORNIA STREET NINTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 (415) 434-2800 -2STIPULATION GRANTING DEFENDANT AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:12-cv-03761-JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?