U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee et al v. Ipurity, Inc. et al
Filing
21
ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS OPPORTUNITY TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION(S). Defendants may file supplemental declarations no later than February 22, 2013, at which time the Court will take the matter under submission. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 1, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2013) .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
U.A. LOCAL 342 JOINT LABORMANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, et al.,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
No. C 12-3779 MMC
ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT
JUDGMENT; AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS
OPPORTUNITY TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION(S)
v.
iPURITY, INC., et al.,
16
Defendants.
/
17
18
Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, filed January 11,
19
2013, by which motion plaintiffs seek judgment in the total amount of $260,763.13,
20
comprising: (1) unpaid and delinquent fringe benefit contributions in the amount of
21
$119,516.35, (2) liquidated damages and interest in the amount of $132,131.78, and (3)
22
attorneys’ fees in the amount of $9115. No opposition has been filed.
23
The moving papers, however, provide insufficient factual support for an award in the
24
amount sought. In particular, the declaration of Kim Biagi (“Biagi”) is lacking in significant
25
details such that the Court is unable to determine how plaintiffs arrived at the amount
26
allegedly owed by defendants.1 Biagi’s declaration contains, for example, no explanation of
27
28
1
The Declaration of Benjamin K. Lunch is sufficient to support plaintiffs’ request for
attorneys’ fees.
1
the basis for Biagi’s claimed knowledge of defendants’ account. Further, the declaration is
2
devoid of any facts or calculations showing how Biagi arrived at the above-referenced
3
damages figures.2
4
Accordingly, the Court will defer ruling on plaintiffs’ motion, and plaintiffs’ are hereby
5
afforded an opportunity to submit additional support for their motion, addressing the
6
deficiencies identified above. Any such declaration(s) and exhibits thereto shall be filed no
7
later than February 22, 2013, at which time the Court will take the matter under submission.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: February 1, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
As one example, the dates from which and to which interest was calculated are not
provided.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?