U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee et al v. Ipurity, Inc. et al

Filing 21

ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS OPPORTUNITY TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION(S). Defendants may file supplemental declarations no later than February 22, 2013, at which time the Court will take the matter under submission. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 1, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2013) .

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 U.A. LOCAL 342 JOINT LABORMANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 No. C 12-3779 MMC ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS OPPORTUNITY TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION(S) v. iPURITY, INC., et al., 16 Defendants. / 17 18 Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, filed January 11, 19 2013, by which motion plaintiffs seek judgment in the total amount of $260,763.13, 20 comprising: (1) unpaid and delinquent fringe benefit contributions in the amount of 21 $119,516.35, (2) liquidated damages and interest in the amount of $132,131.78, and (3) 22 attorneys’ fees in the amount of $9115. No opposition has been filed. 23 The moving papers, however, provide insufficient factual support for an award in the 24 amount sought. In particular, the declaration of Kim Biagi (“Biagi”) is lacking in significant 25 details such that the Court is unable to determine how plaintiffs arrived at the amount 26 allegedly owed by defendants.1 Biagi’s declaration contains, for example, no explanation of 27 28 1 The Declaration of Benjamin K. Lunch is sufficient to support plaintiffs’ request for attorneys’ fees. 1 the basis for Biagi’s claimed knowledge of defendants’ account. Further, the declaration is 2 devoid of any facts or calculations showing how Biagi arrived at the above-referenced 3 damages figures.2 4 Accordingly, the Court will defer ruling on plaintiffs’ motion, and plaintiffs’ are hereby 5 afforded an opportunity to submit additional support for their motion, addressing the 6 deficiencies identified above. Any such declaration(s) and exhibits thereto shall be filed no 7 later than February 22, 2013, at which time the Court will take the matter under submission. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: February 1, 2013 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 As one example, the dates from which and to which interest was calculated are not provided. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?