U.A. Local 342 Joint Labor-Management Committee et al v. Ipurity, Inc. et al
Filing
24
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 28, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
U.A. LOCAL 342 JOINT LABORMANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, et al.,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
No. C 12-3779 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF
DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
v.
iPURITY, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
/
17
18
On February 21, 2013, plaintiffs filed a “Supplemental Declaration of Kim Biagi in
19
Support of Motion for Default Judgment Against iPurity, Inc.” Plaintiffs have violated the
20
Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s standing orders, however, by failing “to
21
provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked
22
‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases
23
Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
24
Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
25
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting chambers copies of the above-
26
referenced document. Plaintiffs are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply
27
with the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed
28
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from
1
the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely
2
provided to the Court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: February 28, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?