Proview Technology, Inc. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 68

ORDER extending deadline to file trial schedule to 5/12/14., Motions terminated: (8998 in 3:07-md-01827-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re (8973) Case Management Conference -. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/8/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2014)

1

5

DAVID B. ESAU
CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A.
CityPlace Tower
525 Okeechobee Boulevard, Suite 1200
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6

Liaison Counsel for the Direct Action Plaintiffs

2
3
4

7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827

15

This document Relates to:

16

Acer America Corp., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al.,
3:13-cv-03349-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO
SUBMIT PROPOSED TRACK 3
SCHEDULE

17
18
19
20

Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp., et
al., 3:13-cv-06001-SI
Proview Technology, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp., et
al., 3:12-cv-03802-SI

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs and Defendants (collectively, “Parties”) in the above-captioned cases (collectively, the
“Track 3 cases”) hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, at a Case Management Conference on April 23, 2014, the Court requested that the
Parties submit a proposed pretrial and trial schedule for the Track 3 cases by May 7, 2014;
WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and are working toward a proposed schedule, but need a
few extra days to complete that process;
29930096.1

1

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT PROPOSED TRACK 3 SCHEDULE

1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the Parties, and subject to the

2

concurrence of the Court, that the deadline for the Parties to submit a proposed pretrial and trial schedule

3

for the Track 3 cases shall be extended until May 12, 2014.

4

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

5
6

Dated: May 6, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

7
8

NOSSAMAN LLP

9

By:

/s/ Carl L. Blumenstein___
Carl L. Blumenstein

10
Christopher A. Nedeau
Carl L. Blumenstein
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

11
12
13
14

Counsel for Defendants AU Optronics Corporation
and AU Optronics Corporation America and
Liaison Counsel for Defendants

15
16
17
18

Dated: May 6, 2014_____________________

CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A.

19
By:
20
21

/s/ David B. Esau
David B. Esau

23

David B. Esau
525 Okeechobee Boulevard, Suite 1200
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6350
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

24

Liaison Counsel for the Direct Action Plaintiffs

22

25
26
27
28

Attestation: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories.
29930096.1

2

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT PROPOSED TRACK 3 SCHEDULE

1

ORDER

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated:

5/8/14

The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29930096.1

3

Case No. 3:07-md-1827 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT PROPOSED TRACK 3 SCHEDULE