Bowman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Filing 13

Second STIPULATION AND ORDER To Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/9/12. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2012)

Download PDF
I MARK L. BLOCK,ESQ.(SBN n54s7) mblock@warqofrench.com 2 JEFFREY WILUAMS, ESQ.(SBN274008) N. jwil liams@wargofrench.com 3 WARGO& FRENCHLLP 4 1888 Century ParkEast,Suite1520 CA 5 Los Angeles, 90067 (310)853-6300 Telephone: 6 Facsimile:(310)853-6333 7 Attorneysfor Defendant 8 JPMORGAN CHASEBANK, N.A. 9 UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT l0 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA il t2 SCOTT BOWMAN, Plaintiffs, l3 t4 v. Case CV12-3832-JCS No. SECOND JOINT STIPULATIONTO EXTENDTIME TO RESPOND TO INTTIALCOMPLAINT(L.R.6-l(a)) l5 JPMORGAN CHASEBANK, N.A., and t 6 DOESI through20, inclusive, t7 l8 Defendants. l 9 tl 20 il 2 l tl 22 tl 23 tl 24 /t 25 il 26 tl 27 tl 28 t/ 2ndJOINT STIP.TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND IMTHJ, COMPLAIM TO I 2 STTPULATION l. Plaintiff ScoftBowman ("Plaintiff') andDefendant JPMorgan Chase 3 BankN.A. ("Chase") desire continue to pleading Chase's responsive deadline that so 4 theparties mayfocustheir energies properly on understanding issues this case the in 5 and/or resolving action. This extension time shallnot alteranyCourtdeadline, the of 6 andunderLocalRule6-l(a), need beapproved the Court. not by 7 8 2. The parties therefore stipulate that: a. 9 Chase shallhaveuntil October15,20l2,to answer, plead,or otherwise respond Plaintiffs Complaint. to l0 ll Dated: October ZOLZ 5- WARGO& FRENCHLLP t2 l3 N. JEFFREY WILLIAMS t4 l5 Attorneys for Defendant JPMorganChaseBank, N.A. l6 t7 l 8 Dated: October_12012 19 20 2l 22 S ER R NIA FO A H 27 pero S seph C. Judge Jo LI RT 26 ERED O ORD IT IS S NO 25 UNIT ED 24 Dated: 10/09/12 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 23 Attorneyfor Plaintiff ScottBowman N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 -t2nd JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND TII}TE TO RESPONDTO INITIAL COMPLATNT I PROOFOF SERVICE 2 UNITED STATBSDISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ) 6 I amemployed the Countyof Los Angeles, in State California;I am overthe of ageof 18andpot a partyto the within action;my business is address 1888Century ParkEast, Suite1520, Angeles, Los California 90067. On October 5,2012,I served foregoing the document(s) described SECOND as JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RBSPONDTO IMTIA.L 8 COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-l(a)) on the interested parties this actionby delivering to a envelope addressed eachof saidinterested parties the to at 9 copythereofin a sealed followingaddress(es): ATTACHEDLIST SEE l0 (BY MAIL) I amreadilyfarniliarwith thebusiness practice collectionand for l l tr processing correspondence mailingwith the UnitedStates of for PostalService. t2 This correspondence bedeposited the UnitedStates shall with PostalService this same in the ordinary day course business our Firm'soffice address of at in r3 Los Angeles, California. Service pursuant this paragraph, made to upon t4 motionof a pany sened,shallbepresumed invalid if thepostalcancellation dateof postage meterdateon theenvelope morethanonedayafterthe date is l5 of deposit mailingcontained this affrdavit. for in 7 l6 t7 B l8 t9 20 n (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE)by causing foregoing the document(s) be to electronically filed usingtheCourt'sElectronic Filing System which constitutes service the filed document(s) the individual(s) of on listedon the attached mailinglist. zl (BY PERSONALSERVICE) I caused suchenvelope be delivered hand to by to theofficesof theabove named addressee(s). 22 tr 23 (Federal)I declare I amemployed the office of a member the barof that in of this counat whose dirdctibn service the wasmade.I declare under penaltyof perjurythattheaboveis trueandcorrect. 24 25 Executed October on 5,2012at LosAngeles, California. 26 27 28 PROOFOFSSRVICE I SERVICE LIST 2 JimG. Price, Esq. DeltaLaw Group 3 6569Brentwood Boulevard 4 P.O.Box l4l7 CA 5 Brentwood, 94513 Plaintffi in Pro Per 6 7 I 9 t0 ll t2 l3 l4 l5 l6 t7 l8 r9 20 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOFOFSERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?