Bowman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Filing
13
Second STIPULATION AND ORDER To Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/9/12. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2012)
I MARK L. BLOCK,ESQ.(SBN n54s7)
mblock@warqofrench.com
2 JEFFREY WILUAMS, ESQ.(SBN274008)
N.
jwil liams@wargofrench.com
3
WARGO& FRENCHLLP
4 1888
Century
ParkEast,Suite1520
CA
5 Los Angeles, 90067
(310)853-6300
Telephone:
6 Facsimile:(310)853-6333
7
Attorneysfor Defendant
8 JPMORGAN
CHASEBANK, N.A.
9
UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT
l0
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
il
t2
SCOTT
BOWMAN,
Plaintiffs,
l3
t4
v.
Case CV12-3832-JCS
No.
SECOND
JOINT STIPULATIONTO
EXTENDTIME TO RESPOND
TO
INTTIALCOMPLAINT(L.R.6-l(a))
l5
JPMORGAN
CHASEBANK, N.A., and
t 6 DOESI through20, inclusive,
t7
l8
Defendants.
l 9 tl
20 il
2 l tl
22 tl
23 tl
24 /t
25 il
26 tl
27 tl
28 t/
2ndJOINT STIP.TO EXTEND
TIME TO RESPOND IMTHJ, COMPLAIM
TO
I
2
STTPULATION
l.
Plaintiff ScoftBowman
("Plaintiff') andDefendant
JPMorgan
Chase
3 BankN.A. ("Chase")
desire continue
to
pleading
Chase's
responsive
deadline that
so
4 theparties
mayfocustheir energies properly
on
understanding issues this case
the
in
5 and/or
resolving action. This extension time shallnot alteranyCourtdeadline,
the
of
6 andunderLocalRule6-l(a), need beapproved the Court.
not
by
7
8
2.
The parties
therefore
stipulate
that:
a.
9
Chase
shallhaveuntil October15,20l2,to answer,
plead,or
otherwise
respond Plaintiffs Complaint.
to
l0
ll
Dated: October ZOLZ
5-
WARGO& FRENCHLLP
t2
l3
N.
JEFFREY WILLIAMS
t4
l5
Attorneys for Defendant
JPMorganChaseBank, N.A.
l6
t7
l 8 Dated: October_12012
19
20
2l
22
S
ER
R NIA
FO
A
H
27
pero
S
seph C.
Judge Jo
LI
RT
26
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
25
UNIT
ED
24 Dated: 10/09/12
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
23
Attorneyfor Plaintiff
ScottBowman
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
28
-t2nd JOINT STIP. TO EXTEND TII}TE TO RESPONDTO INITIAL COMPLATNT
I
PROOFOF SERVICE
2
UNITED STATBSDISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA
3
4
)
6
I amemployed the Countyof Los Angeles,
in
State California;I am overthe
of
ageof 18andpot a partyto the within action;my business
is
address 1888Century
ParkEast,
Suite1520, Angeles,
Los
California
90067.
On October
5,2012,I served foregoing
the
document(s)
described SECOND
as
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RBSPONDTO IMTIA.L
8 COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-l(a)) on the interested
parties this actionby delivering
to
a
envelope
addressed eachof saidinterested
parties the
to
at
9 copythereofin a sealed
followingaddress(es): ATTACHEDLIST
SEE
l0
(BY MAIL) I amreadilyfarniliarwith thebusiness
practice collectionand
for
l l tr
processing correspondence mailingwith the UnitedStates
of
for
PostalService.
t2
This correspondence bedeposited the UnitedStates
shall
with
PostalService
this same in the ordinary
day
course business our Firm'soffice address
of
at
in
r3
Los Angeles,
California. Service
pursuant this paragraph,
made
to
upon
t4
motionof a pany sened,shallbepresumed
invalid if thepostalcancellation
dateof postage
meterdateon theenvelope morethanonedayafterthe date
is
l5
of deposit mailingcontained this affrdavit.
for
in
7
l6
t7 B
l8
t9
20 n
(BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE)by causing foregoing
the
document(s) be
to
electronically
filed usingtheCourt'sElectronic
Filing System
which
constitutes
service the filed document(s) the individual(s)
of
on
listedon the
attached
mailinglist.
zl
(BY PERSONALSERVICE) I caused
suchenvelope be delivered hand
to
by
to theofficesof theabove
named
addressee(s).
22 tr
23
(Federal)I declare I amemployed the office of a member the barof
that
in
of
this counat whose
dirdctibn service
the
wasmade.I declare
under
penaltyof perjurythattheaboveis trueandcorrect.
24
25
Executed October
on
5,2012at LosAngeles,
California.
26
27
28
PROOFOFSSRVICE
I
SERVICE
LIST
2 JimG. Price,
Esq.
DeltaLaw Group
3
6569Brentwood
Boulevard
4 P.O.Box l4l7
CA
5 Brentwood, 94513
Plaintffi in Pro Per
6
7
I
9
t0
ll
t2
l3
l4
l5
l6
t7
l8
r9
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOFOFSERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?