Icon-IP Pty Ltd. v. Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc.

Filing 110

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 93 MOTION for Leave to File MOTION to Amend/Correct Specialized's Invalidity Contentions filed by Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 22, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ICON-IP PTY LTD., Case No. 12-cv-03844-JST Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 SPECIALIZED BICYCLE COMPONENTS, INC., ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING Re: ECF No. 93 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to 14 Amend Its Invalidity Contentions. ECF No. 93. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the parties’ briefs have thoroughly 16 addressed the issues, rendering the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The 17 hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for October 2, 2014, is hereby VACATED. 18 However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 19 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 20 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 21 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 22 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 23 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 24 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 22, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?