Icon-IP Pty Ltd. v. Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc.
Filing
110
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 93 MOTION for Leave to File MOTION to Amend/Correct Specialized's Invalidity Contentions filed by Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 22, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ICON-IP PTY LTD.,
Case No. 12-cv-03844-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
SPECIALIZED BICYCLE COMPONENTS,
INC.,
ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING
Re: ECF No. 93
Defendant.
12
13
Before the Court is Defendant Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to
14
Amend Its Invalidity Contentions. ECF No. 93. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
15
78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the parties’ briefs have thoroughly
16
addressed the issues, rendering the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The
17
hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for October 2, 2014, is hereby VACATED.
18
However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
19
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
20
been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
21
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
22
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
23
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
24
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 22, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?