Icon-IP Pty Ltd. v. Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc.
Filing
134
STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting re 133 Stipulation to Continue Pretrial Deadline Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2: Close of Fact Discovery due 11/26/2014. Designation of Expert Witnesses and Exchange of Initial Expert Reports for which party bears burden due 12/5/2014. Designation of Rebuttal Experts and Exchange of Rebuttal Expert Reports due 1/7/2015 & Close of Expert Discovery due 1/21/2015. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on 11/7/2014. (tnS) (Filed on 11/7/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
MARTIN L. FINEMAN (Bar No. 104413)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 276-6500
Facsimile: (415) 276-6599
Email: martinfineman@dwt.com
RAYMOND P. NIRO
FREDERICK C. LANEY (admitted pro hac vice)
ASHLEY E. LaVALLEY (admitted pro hac vice)
NIRO, HALLER & NIRO
181 W. Madison, Suite 4600
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Phone: (312) 236-0733
Fax: (312) 236-3137
E-mail: rniro@nshn.com
E-mail: laney@nshn.com
E-mail: alavalley@nshn.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff ICON-IP PTY LTD.
13
DARRELL L. OLSON (Bar No. 77633)
BENJAMIN J. EVERTON (Bar No.
259214)
Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP
2040 Main Street, Suite 1400
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 760-0404
Facsimile: (949) 760-9502
Email: darrell.olson@knobbe.com
Email: benjamin.everton@knobbe.com
Attorneys for Defendant SPECIALIZED
BICYCLE COMPONENTS, INC.
IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANSCISCO DIVISION
14
15
16
17
18
ICON-IP PTY, LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v.
19
SPECIALIZED BICYCLE
COMPONENTS, INC.,
20
Defendant.
21
22
) Case No. CV-12-3844 JST
)
)
)
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
) ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL
) DEADLINES PURSUANT TO CIVIL
) L.R. 6-2
)
)
) Hon. Jon S. Tigar
)
)
)
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 CASE NO. 12-CV-03844-JST
-1-
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 and pursuant to this Court’s November 5, 2014 Order (Dkt.
2
No. 132), Plaintiff Icon-IP Pty Ltd. (“Icon”) and Defendant Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc.
3
(“Specialized”), by and through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate and request that
4
5
the Court enter an Order extending certain pretrial deadlines as set forth below. In support of this
request, the parties state as follows:
6
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to modify the discovery deadlines as follows:
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Event
Close of Fact Discovery
Designation of Expert
Witnesses and Exchange of
Initial Expert Reports for
which party bears burden
Designation of Rebuttal
Experts and Exchange of
Rebuttal Expert Reports
Close of Expert Discovery
Deadline to File Dispositive
Motions
Pretrial Conference Statement
Pretrial Conference
Trial
Current Dates
October 24, 2014
Proposed Dates
November 26, 2014
November 21, 2014
December 5, 2014
December 19, 2014
January 7, 2015
January 19, 2015
January 21, 2015
January 23, 2015
Unchanged
April 21, 2015
May 1, 2015
May 26, 2015 at 8:30 a.m.
Unchanged
Unchanged
Unchanged
18
19
WHEREAS, the parties agree as follows:
20
Specialized will make Nick Gosseen and Tom Larter available for deposition pursuant to
21
Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(1);
22
Subject to its objections and responses, Specialized will designate Nick Gosseen, Tom
23
Larter, and Efren Gonzalez on the following deposition topics listed in Icon’s Amended Notice of
24
Deposition of Specialized Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6): Topic Nos. 1-6, 9-22, 23 (as
25
26
27
modified per agreement), 24-34, 36-40, 45-46, 51-56, 68, 69, 70, 71, 74, 78, 79, and 81.
Subject to its objections and responses, Specialized will produce Ms. Kim Arca for
deposition on topics 41 and 42;
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 CASE NO. 12-CV-03844-JST
-2-
1
2
The parties agree that Specialized will not produce a witness on any of the remaining
30(b)(6) topics.
3
4
5
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties by and through their
undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an Order continuing certain
deadlines as identified above.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated:
By: _/s/ Ashley E. LaValley_______________
Raymond P. Niro
Frederick C. Laney
Ashley E. Lavalley
NIRO, HALLER & NIRO
Attorneys for ICON-IP PTY, LTD.
Dated:
By:__/s/ Darrell L. Olson
Darrell L. Olson
Benjamin J. Everton
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
Attorneys for SPECIALIZED BICYCLE
COMPONENTS, INC.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 CASE NO. 12-CV-03844-JST
-3-
1
January 7, 2015
January 21, 2015
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
12
Judge Jo
ER
H
10
11
NO
9
TED
GRAN
Dated: 11/7/2014
By:
n S. Tig
RT
U
O
7
R NIA
6
ar
FO
December 5, 2014
LI
5
Event
Close of Fact Discovery
Designation of Expert Witnesses and Exchange of Initial Expert
Reports for which party bears burden
Designation of Rebuttal Experts and Exchange of Rebuttal
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
Expert Reports
AT
T
Close of Expert Discovery
A
4
deadlines as follows:
Dates
November 26, 2014
S
3
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court continues the fact and expert discovery
UNIT
ED
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 CASE NO. 12-CV-03844-JST
-4-
FILER’S ATTESTATION
1
2
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i) regarding signatures, I, Ashley E. LaValley, attest that
3
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I
4
declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is
5
true and correct.
6
7
Dated:
8
9
By:
/s/ Ashley E. LaValley
Ashley E. LaValley
NIRO, HALLER & NIRO
Attorneys for Icon-IP Pty Ltd.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES
TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 CASE NO. 12-CV-03844-JST
-5-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?