Icon-IP Pty Ltd. v. Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc.
Filing
139
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 138 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages in connection with Specialized's contemplated Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 6, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Darrell L. Olson (SBN 77633)
darrell.olson@kmob.com
Benjamin J. Everton (SBN 259214)
ben.everton@kmob.com
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
2040 Main Street
Fourteenth Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Phone: (949) 760-0404
Facsimile: (949) 760-9502
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
SPECIALIZED BICYCLE COMPONENTS, INC.
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant )
)
v.
)
)
SPECIALIZED BICYCLE
)
COMPONENTS, INC.,
)
)
Defendant/Counterclaimant )
)
)
)
)
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS )
)
ICON-IP PTY, LTD.,
Case No. CV 12-3844 JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING STIPULATED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO EXCEED OTHERWISE
APPLICABLE PAGE
LIMITATIONS
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order
Case no. CV 12-3844 JST
1
Having considered Defendant Specialized Bicycle Components Inc.’s
2
Administrative Motion, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
3
as follows:
4
The brief or memoranda page limits with respect to Defendant
5
Specialized Bicycle Components Inc.’s contemplated Motion for Summary
6
Judgment will be as follows:
7
Opening brief or memorandum, not to exceed 35 pages;
8
Opposition brief or memorandum not to exceed 35 pages; and
9
Reply brief or memorandum not to exceed 15 pages.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
S
FO
LI
ER
H
17
19577144
RT
16
NO
15
R NIA
Dated: January 6, 2015
D
RDERE
S SO O
IT I
By:
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Court Judge
i ga r
Jon S. T
J u d ge
18
A
14
UNIT
ED
13
RT
U
O
12
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
[Proposed] Order
Case no. CV 12-3844 JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?