Korb v. Commissioner of Social Security et al

Filing 64

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 63 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUEDEADLINES FOR FILING OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Richard E. Korb. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 4, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Richard E. Korb (SB # 98140)
LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD E. KORB
1563 Solano Avenue, # 441
Berkeley, CA 94707
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiffs Richard Korb
(In Pro Se) and Faye Korb

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH

10
11

Richard E. Korb, Faye Y. Korb,

Case No. CV 12-3847-JST

12

Plaintiffs,

13

vs.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEADLINES FOR FILING OPPOSITION
AND REPLY BRIEFS ON MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
PROPOSED ORDER

14
15
16

Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner
of Social Security and the Social Security
Administration,

Defendants.
______________________________________
17

Courtroom 9; 19th Floor
The Hon. Jon S. Tigar

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

I. INTRODUCTION
1. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on December 1, 2014. Plaintiff‘s
Opposition is currently due December 15, 2014 and Defendant’s Reply is due December
29, 2014. Plaintiff’s counter-reply is due January 5, 2014. (Court’s Order Docket No. 55.)
2. Plaintiff’ attorney, Richard Korb, will be out of the country from December 6-15, 2014,
and Defendant’s counsel will be on vacation the last two weeks of December.
3. The parties hereby agree to continue the deadline for Plaintiff’s Opposition to December
26, 2014, continue Defendant’s Reply deadline to January 9, 2015 and continue
Plaintiff’s Reply to any counter motion to January 16, 2015.

28
STIP to CONTINUE MSJ FILING DEADLINES AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

II. PROPOSED STIPULATION

2

4. It is hereby stipulated that the briefing schedule on Defendant’s motion for summary

3

judgment is modified to permit Plaintiff’s Opposition to be filed on or before December

4

26, 2014; Defendant’s Reply to be filed by January 9, 2015 and Plaintiff’s Reply to any

5

counter motion to January 16, 2015.

6
7
8

SIGNATURES:

9

LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD E. KORB

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

By: /s/ Richard E. Korb
RICHARD E. KORB, Esq.
Attorney for the Plaintiffs

By: /s/ Susan L. Smith
SUSAN L. SMITH, Esq.
Attorney for the Defendants

17
18

III. PROPOSED ORDER
Good cause appearing herein, the filing deadline for Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’

19

Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to December 26, 2014; Defendant’s Reply is now

20

due on January 9, 2015 and Plaintiff’s Reply to anyS DISTmotion to January 16, 2015.
E counter RIC

S

28

R NIA

FO

Jud

ER

H

27

RT

26

NO

25

ED

ER
The Hon. Jon S. Tigar
O ORD
IS SCourtroom 9
IT
Judge,
US District Court
Northern District of California
ga r
SF Division n S. Ti
ge J o

LI

24

___________________

A

23

Dated: December 4, 2014

UNIT
ED

22

TC

RT
U
O

21

T
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

STIP to CONTINUE MSJ FILING DEADLINES AND PROPOSED ORDER

C