Anderson v. Solis
Filing
101
Order as Modified by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 99 Motion for the case to be reopened until 8/25/2015.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
Michael D. Meadows (State Bar No. 62110)
Andrew C. Schwartz (State Bar No. 64578)
CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK
A Professional Corporation
California Plaza
2121 North California Blvd., Suite 1020
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Telephone: (925) 947-1147
Facsimile:
(925) 947-1131
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
GEORGE ANDERSON,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
Civil Action No.: CV-12-3855 VC
Assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria
vs.
JOSEPH SOLIZ, JAMES DIENER, ADAM
RICHARDSON, CRAIG ROTHHAMMER
AND DOES 4-100
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO
REINSTATE THE CASE AS MODIFIED
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff George Anderson’s (“Plaintiff”) request to reinstate
the case seeking an additional 30 days to consummate the settlement between the parties so that
the instant action is not dismissed with prejudice on July 26, 2015. It is hereby ORDERED that
Plaintiff’s request IS GRANTED. The instant action is reinstated. The parties shall retain the
right to prosecute and defend the action. The parties shall have until August 25, 2015 to
consummate the settlement. Hence, if the Court does not receive a request from either party
before August 25, 2015 that further time is needed to consummate the settlement, the case will
be dismissed with prejudice. The CMC set for 8/18/2015 is hereby vacated.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED
26
27
28
CASPER, MEADOWS,
SCHWARTZ & COOK
2121 N. California Blvd.,
Suite 1020
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
TEL: (925) 947-1147
FAX (925) 947-1131
Dated:
August 3, 2015
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
Anderson v. Soliz, et al.
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff’s Request to Reinstate the Case
Page 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?