Technology Properties Limited LLC et al v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.

Filing 38

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 37 Stipulation Extending Time to Disclose Invalidity Contentions.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2014)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758)
[e-mail]

50 California Street, 22nd Floor
 San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

 Attorneys for Defendant Barnes & Noble, Inc.



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA



SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


 TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED
LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BARNES & NOBLE, INC.,

Defendant.










CASE NO. 3:12-cv-03863-VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
DISCLOSE INVALIDITY
CONTENTIONS

STIPULATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, Defendant Barnes & Noble, Inc. (“Barnes & Noble”)
and Plaintiffs Technology Properties Ltd., Patriot Scientific Corp., and Phoenix Digital Solutions
(collectively “Plaintiffs”) hereby stipulate and request an order from the Court extending by one
week the time for Barnes & Noble to serve its invalidity contentions and accompanying document
production pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4.
Shortly after this case was filed, the Court stayed the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a)

 and its inherent authority. As a result, the time for serving infringement contentions and invalidity
 contentions was tolled.


After this Court lifted the stay, the parties agreed to exchange

infringement contentions on July 22, 2014 and invalidity contentions on September 5, 2014.


Case No. 3:12-cv-03863-VC
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Serve Invalidity Contention

1 These dates were submitted to the Court in the Joint Case Management Statement filed on July 1,
2 2014 (D.E. 28).
3
4

Barnes & Noble requests a one-week extension of time until September 12, 2014 to serve
its invalidity contentions and accompanying document production in order to enable it to more

5
6
7

fully present its contentions. Plaintiffs stipulate to Barnes & Noble’s requested extension.
As required by Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties state that other than the adjustments made

8 necessary by the stay as discussed above, they are not aware of any other time modifications made
9 in this case. The requested extension would not affect any pending deadlines in the case.
10
11

DATED: September 4, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

12
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

13
14
15

By /s/ David Eiseman
David Eiseman
Attorneys for Defendant Barnes & Noble, Inc.

16
17
18
19

DATED: September 4, 2014

Respectfully submitted,
AGILITY IP LAW

20
21
22
23

By /s/ James Otteson
James Otteson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Technology Properties
Ltd., Patriot Scientific Corp., and Phoenix Digital
Solutions

24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No. 3:12-cv-03863-VC
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Serve Invalidity Contention

1

ORDER

2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
5 Dated: September ____, 2014

6
_______________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
Case No. 3:12-cv-03863-VC
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Serve Invalidity Contention