Sohaib v. Christian et al
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING re 6 Stipulation For Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by Gregory W. Christian, Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/10/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
MELISSA LEIBMAN, NYSBN 4442877
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Office of Immigration Litigation, DCS
450 5th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Tel: (202) 305-7016; Fax: (202) 305-7000
Email: Melissa.Leibman@usdoj.gov
5
Attorneys for Defendants
6
7
8
9
Ashwani K. Bhakhri, Esq., SBN# 163521
Law Offices of Ashwani K. Bhakhri
1299 Bayshore Highway, Suite 208
Burlingame, California 94010
Telephone: (650) 685-6334
Facsimile: (650) 685-6351
Email: bhakhrilaw2004@yahoo.com
10
Attorney for Plaintiff
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
Mohammed Hamza Sohaib,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
v.
Gregory Christian, Acting Director USCIS
Nebraska Service Center; Janet Napolitano,
Secretary of the Department of Homeland
Security; and Eric H. Holder, Jr., United
States Attorney General,
No. 12-03867 JCS
STIPULATION for Extension of Time to
Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint
and
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Immigration Case, Mandamus
Before: Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero
Defendants.
21
22
23
Stipulation RE Extension of Time to Answer
Case No. 12-03867 JCS
1
1
The parties hereby respectfully request that this Court approve the parties’ stipulation to
2
extend Defendants’ time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. The parties
3
agree to the following terms:
4
1.
5
Answer or Response is currently due on January 12, 2013; and
6
2.
7
the Complaint.
8
Plaintiffs properly served the Complaint on November 13, 2012, and Defendants’
Defendants shall have until February 11, 2013, to answer or otherwise respond to
Dated: January 9, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
9
/s/________________
Ashwani K. Bhakhri, Esq.
Law Offices of Ashwani K. Bhakhri
1299 Bayshore Highway, Suite 208
Burlingame, California 94010
Attorney for Plaintiff
10
11
12
13
Dated: January 9, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
14
/s/________________
Melissa S. Leibman
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Office of Immigration Litigation, DCS
Attorney for Defendants
17
18
UNIT
ED
S
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
20
January 10, 2013
Date: _________________
o
C. Sper
NO
21
22
LI
RT
seph
Hon. Joseph C.e Spero
Judg Jo
H
ER
United States Magistrate Judge
C
A
19
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
R NIA
16
FO
15
N
23
Stipulation RE Extension of Time to Answer
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Case No. 12-03867 JCS
2
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
I, Melissa Leibman, the undersigned, certify:
I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action or proceedings;
I am a Trial Attorney for the United States Department of Justice and my office is located at
450 5th St. NW, Rm 6022 Washington, D.C., 20001. On January 9, 2013, I caused the
STIPULATION for Extension of Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the
Complaint and for Filing, Briefing, and Argument on Plaintiffs’ Anticipated Summary Judgment
Motion and [PROPOSED] ORDER to be filed with the Clerk of Court for the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California by using the appellate CM/ECF system.
I also certify that Ashwani K. Bhakhri, Esq., of the Law Offices of Ashwani K. Bhakhri
1299 Bayshore Highway, Suite 208, Burlingame, California 94010, who has entered his
appearance on behalf of Plaintiff, is a registered CM/ECF user and that service will be
accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system.
15
/s/________________
Melissa S. Leibman
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Office of Immigration Litigation, DCS
16
17
18
Attorney for Defendants
19
20
21
22
23
Stipulation RE Extension of Time to Answer
Case No. 12-03867 JCS
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?