Technology Properties Limited LLC et al v. Novatel Wireless, Inc.

Filing 47

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 7/14/2015. (knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2015)

Download PDF
1 Christopher D. Banys, Esq. Jennifer L. Gilbert, Esq. 2 BAYNS, P.C. 1032 Elwell Court, Suite 100 3 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Tel: (650) 308-5805 4 Fax: (650) 353-2202 Email: cdb@banyspc.com 5 jlg@banyspc.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 PHOENIX DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, LLC 7 Charles T. Hoge (110696) choge@knlh.com KIRBY NOONAN LANCE & HOGE LLP 9 350 Tenth Avenue, Suite 1300 San Diego, California 92101-8700 10 Telephone: (619) 231-8666 Facsimile: (619) 231-9593 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 12 350 Tenth Avenue, Suite 1300 San Diego, California 92101 -8700 Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge LLP 8 13 William L. Bretschneider, Esq. SILICON VALLEY LAW GROUP 14 50 W. San Fernando Street, Suite 750 San Jose, CA 95113 15 Tel: (408) 573-5700 Fax: (408) 573-5701 16 Email: wlb@svlg.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 17 TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, LLC 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 21 TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, 22 LLC, PHOENIX DIGITAL SOLUTIONS LLC, and PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC 23 CORPORATION, Case No. 3:12-cv-03879-VC 24 Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria Mag. Judge Paul S. Grewal 25 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL vs. 26 NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC., 27 Defendant. 28 KNLH\1401495.1 2-cv-03879-VC STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL In accordance with an agreement between the parties, Plaintiffs and Defendant Novatel 3 Wireless, Inc. herein, having settled all claims and counterclaims in this action; and the Court 4 being otherwise fully advised; 5 IT IS ORDERED that all pending motions are hereby deemed withdrawn by the parties 6 and this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to any party. This order 7 resolves the pending claims between and among the parties and closes the case. However, this 350 Tenth Avenue, Suite 1300 San Diego, California 92101 -8700 Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge LLP 8 order does not resolve any other pending related Case Nos. 3:12-cv-03863-VC [Technology 9 Properties Limited, LLC, et al. v. Barnes & Noble, et al.], 3:12-cv-03870-VC [Technology 10 Properties Limited, LLC, et al. v. Garmin, et al.], 3:12-cv-03865-VC [Technology Properties 11 Limited, LLC, et al. v. Huawei, et al.], 3:12-cv-03880-VC [Technology Properties Limited, 12 LLC, et al. v. LG, et al.], 3:12-cv-03881-VC [Technology Properties Limited, LLC, et al. v. 13 Nintendo, et al.], 3:12-cv-03877-VC [Technology Properties Limited, LLC, et al. v. Samsung, 14 et al.], 3:12-cv-03876-VC [Technology Properties Limited, LLC, et al. v. ZTE, et al.] 15 16 DATED: July 1, 2015 BAYNS, P.C. 17 18 By: /s/ Christopher D. Banys Christopher D. Banys, Esq. Jennifer L. Gilbert, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff PHOENIX DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, LLC 19 20 21 22 DATED: July 1, 2015 KIRBY NOONAN LANCE & HOGE LLP 23 24 By: /s/ Charles T. Hoge Charles T. Hoge Attorneys for Plaintiff PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 25 26 27 28 KNLH\1401495.1 -1- 2-cv-03879-VC STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 DATED: July 1, 2015 SILICON VALLEY LAW GROUP 2 3 By: /s/ William L. Bretschneider William L. Bretschneider, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, LLC 4 5 6 7 9 10 By: /s/ Christopher W. Kennerly Christopher W. Kennerly Elizabeth L. Brann Attorneys for Defendant NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC. 11 12 13 14 S DISTRICT 15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. TE TA UNIT ED S 18 19 ED Hon. PaulSO ORDER Singh Grewal IT IS U.S. Magistrate Judge ER 22 A H 21 J habr ia LI RT 20 nce Ch u d g e Vi R NIA July 14, 2015 17 DATED: _________________________ C FO 16 NO 350 Tenth Avenue, Suite 1300 San Diego, California 92101 -8700 PAUL HASTINGS LLP RT U O Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge LLP 8 DATED: June 23, 2015 N F D IS T IC T O R C 23 24 25 26 27 28 KNLH\1401495.1 -2- 2-cv-03879-VC STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?