Technology Properties Limited LLC et al v. Novatel Wireless, Inc.
Filing
47
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 7/14/2015. (knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2015)
1 Christopher D. Banys, Esq.
Jennifer L. Gilbert, Esq.
2 BAYNS, P.C.
1032 Elwell Court, Suite 100
3 Palo Alto, CA 94303
Tel: (650) 308-5805
4 Fax: (650) 353-2202
Email: cdb@banyspc.com
5
jlg@banyspc.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6 PHOENIX DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
7
Charles T. Hoge (110696)
choge@knlh.com
KIRBY NOONAN LANCE & HOGE LLP
9 350 Tenth Avenue, Suite 1300
San Diego, California 92101-8700
10 Telephone: (619) 231-8666
Facsimile: (619) 231-9593
11 Attorneys for Plaintiff
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
12
350 Tenth Avenue, Suite 1300 San Diego, California 92101 -8700
Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge LLP
8
13 William L. Bretschneider, Esq.
SILICON VALLEY LAW GROUP
14 50 W. San Fernando Street, Suite 750
San Jose, CA 95113
15 Tel: (408) 573-5700
Fax: (408) 573-5701
16 Email: wlb@svlg.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
17 TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, LLC
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
21
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED,
22 LLC, PHOENIX DIGITAL SOLUTIONS
LLC, and PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC
23 CORPORATION,
Case No. 3:12-cv-03879-VC
24
Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria
Mag. Judge Paul S. Grewal
25
Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
vs.
26 NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC.,
27
Defendant.
28
KNLH\1401495.1
2-cv-03879-VC
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
In accordance with an agreement between the parties, Plaintiffs and Defendant Novatel
3 Wireless, Inc. herein, having settled all claims and counterclaims in this action; and the Court
4 being otherwise fully advised;
5
IT IS ORDERED that all pending motions are hereby deemed withdrawn by the parties
6 and this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to any party. This order
7 resolves the pending claims between and among the parties and closes the case. However, this
350 Tenth Avenue, Suite 1300 San Diego, California 92101 -8700
Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge LLP
8 order does not resolve any other pending related Case Nos. 3:12-cv-03863-VC [Technology
9 Properties Limited, LLC, et al. v. Barnes & Noble, et al.], 3:12-cv-03870-VC [Technology
10 Properties Limited, LLC, et al. v. Garmin, et al.], 3:12-cv-03865-VC [Technology Properties
11 Limited, LLC, et al. v. Huawei, et al.], 3:12-cv-03880-VC [Technology Properties Limited,
12 LLC, et al. v. LG, et al.], 3:12-cv-03881-VC [Technology Properties Limited, LLC, et al. v.
13 Nintendo, et al.], 3:12-cv-03877-VC [Technology Properties Limited, LLC, et al. v. Samsung,
14 et al.], 3:12-cv-03876-VC [Technology Properties Limited, LLC, et al. v. ZTE, et al.]
15
16 DATED: July 1, 2015
BAYNS, P.C.
17
18
By: /s/ Christopher D. Banys
Christopher D. Banys, Esq.
Jennifer L. Gilbert, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PHOENIX DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
19
20
21
22
DATED: July 1, 2015
KIRBY NOONAN LANCE & HOGE LLP
23
24
By: /s/ Charles T. Hoge
Charles T. Hoge
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
25
26
27
28
KNLH\1401495.1
-1-
2-cv-03879-VC
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
DATED: July 1, 2015
SILICON VALLEY LAW GROUP
2
3
By: /s/ William L. Bretschneider
William L. Bretschneider, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED,
LLC
4
5
6
7
9
10
By: /s/ Christopher W. Kennerly
Christopher W. Kennerly
Elizabeth L. Brann
Attorneys for Defendant
NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC.
11
12
13
14
S DISTRICT
15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
TE
TA
UNIT
ED
S
18
19
ED
Hon. PaulSO ORDER
Singh Grewal
IT IS
U.S. Magistrate Judge
ER
22
A
H
21
J
habr ia
LI
RT
20
nce Ch
u d g e Vi
R NIA
July 14, 2015
17 DATED: _________________________
C
FO
16
NO
350 Tenth Avenue, Suite 1300 San Diego, California 92101 -8700
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
RT
U
O
Kirby Noonan Lance & Hoge LLP
8 DATED: June 23, 2015
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
23
24
25
26
27
28
KNLH\1401495.1
-2-
2-cv-03879-VC
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?