Pag-Daly City, LLC v. Quality Auto Locators, Inc et al

Filing 141

NOTICE REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
PAG-DALY CITY, LLC,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 12-03907 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

NOTICE REGARDING
ORAL ARGUMENT

14

QUALITY AUTO LOCATORS, INC., et
al.,

15

Defendants.
/

16
17

After reviewing the written submissions, the Court is of the view that oral argument is

18

unnecessary and will proceed to issue an order soon and to vacate the hearing set for January 31.

19

If, however, one counsel advises the Court in writing by NOON ON JANUARY 25 that most or all

20

of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer of four or fewer years out of law

21

school (see Supplemental Order, dkt. no. 53 at ¶ 6), then the hearing will remain in place in order

22

to provide that opportunity.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: January 22, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE