Pag-Daly City, LLC v. Quality Auto Locators, Inc et al

Filing 141


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 PAG-DALY CITY, LLC, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 12-03907 WHA Plaintiff, v. NOTICE REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT 14 QUALITY AUTO LOCATORS, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. / 16 17 After reviewing the written submissions, the Court is of the view that oral argument is 18 unnecessary and will proceed to issue an order soon and to vacate the hearing set for January 31. 19 If, however, one counsel advises the Court in writing by NOON ON JANUARY 25 that most or all 20 of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer of four or fewer years out of law 21 school (see Supplemental Order, dkt. no. 53 at ΒΆ 6), then the hearing will remain in place in order 22 to provide that opportunity. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 22, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?