Pag-Daly City, LLC v. Quality Auto Locators, Inc et al

Filing 32

ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 30 Stipulation (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 WILLIAM A. LOGAN, JR. (BAR NO. 115042) LAURA M. MOONEY (BAR NO. 203692) PUTTERMAN LOGAN & GILES LLP 580 California Street, 16th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Mail service address: 2175 N. California Blvd, Suite 805 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Tel: (415) 839-8779 Fax: (415) 376-0956 E-mail: wlogan@plglawyers.com Attorneys for Plaintiff PAG-DALY CITY, LLC, dba City Toyota 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 PAG-DALY CITY, LLC dba CITY TOYOTA, No. 3:12-cv-3907-MEJ 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT FAULKNER TREVOSE, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND TO CHANGE HEARING DATE 15 QUALITY AUTO LOCATORS, INC. et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND GOOD CAUSE 22 APPEARING HEREIN, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT Plaintiff PAG-Daly City, LLC shall file its 23 opposition to Defendant Faulkner Trevose, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Personal 24 Jurisdiction on October 17, 2012, and Defendant Faulkner Trevose, Inc.. shall file its Reply on 25 October 24, 2012. The hearing for the motion shall be changed and the hearing on the motion is now 26 set for November 8, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 1 3:12-CV-3907-MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER S UNIT ED RT U O October 10, 2012 Dated: _________________________ 2 3 aria Judge M 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 3:12-CV-3907-MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER A H ER LI RT 5 ames -Elena J NO 4 R NIA ________________________________ Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court FO 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?