Pag-Daly City, LLC v. Quality Auto Locators, Inc et al

Filing 43

ORDER by Judge Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 37 Stipulation (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

WILLIAM A. LOGAN, JR. (BAR NO. 115042)
LAURA M. MOONEY (BAR NO. 203692)
PUTTERMAN LOGAN & GILES LLP
580 California Street, 16th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Mail service address:
2175 N. California Blvd, Suite 805
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PAG-DALY CITY, LLC, dba City Toyota

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
PAG-DALY CITY, LLC dba CITY TOYOTA,

No.

3:12-cv-3907-MEJ

13
Plaintiff,
14
v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING DEADLINE TO
FILE EITHER A STIPULATION
TO ADR PROCESS OR NOTICE
FOR ADR PHONE CONFERENCE,
AND TO FILE AN ADR
CERTIFICATION

15
QUALITY AUTO LOCATORS, INC. et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND GOOD CAUSE

21

APPEARING HEREIN, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the deadline for Plaintiff and defendants Bert

22

Wolfe, Inc., dba Bert Wolfe Toyota, Faulkner Trevose, Inc., dba Faulkner Toyota, Herb Chambers

23

1168, Inc., dba Herb Chambers Toyota, Joseph T of D Co., dba Joseph Airport Toyota, Muller

24

Automotive, Inc. dba Lawrence Toyota, LaFontaine Motors, Inc., dba LaFontaine Toyota; Page

25

Imports, Inc., dba Page Toyota; and Walker Auto Group dba Walker Toyota, to file either a

26

Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference, and to file an ADR

27

Certification under Local Rule 16-8(b), is continued from October 11, 2012, and the new filing

28

deadline for each of the named defendants shall be five days following entry of the Court’s order on
1
3:12-CV-3907-MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

that defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or other Rule 12(b) motion,

2

and that Plaintiff’s deadline shall be five days following entry of any order on a defendant’s motion

3

to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or other Rule 12(b) motion, or the filing of an Answer by a

4

defendant, whichever occurs first.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

October 15, 2012
Dated: _________________________

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

RT

11

aria-E
Judge M

ER

H

12

es

lena Jam

NO

10

FO

9

LI

8

R NIA

________________________________
Magistrate Judge of the
United States District Court

UNIT
ED

7

S

6

A

5

N

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
3:12-CV-3907-MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C