Gardensensor, Inc v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc
Filing
95
ORDER RE: JOINT STATEMENT ON DISCOVERY ISSUES. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 9/8/2014. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11 GARDENSENSOR, INC., a Delaware
12
13
Corporation, formerly known as
PLANTSENSE, INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
Plaintiff,
14
15
Case No. 12-cv-03922 NC
ORDER RE: JOINT STATEMENT
ON DISCOVERY ISSUES
Re: Dkt. No. 94
v.
BLACK & DECKER (U.S.), INC., a
16 Maryland Corporation,
17
Defendant.
18
19
On September 5, 2014, the last day to file letter briefs, the parties filed a joint
20 statement on discovery issues in which plaintiff Gardensensor “seeks an order directing that
21 by September 12, 2014, Defendant: (i) produce employees’ performance evaluations for the
22 PlantSmart project; (ii) respond to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories Nos. 1, 5, 6, 12-15, and 17; (iii)
23 confirm that documents cannot be retrieved from Ansell’s assistant’s deleted files; (iv)
24 produce unredacted versions of all documents containing improper redactions; (v) confirm
25 that Defendant has otherwise produced all responsive documents in its possession; and (vi)
26 provide any further relief that the Court deems proper.” Dkt. No. 94.
27
By September 9, 2014, Gardensensor must file a copy of all discovery requests for
28 which it is seeking to compel further responses or document production in the pending
Case No. 12-cv-03922 NC
ORDER RE: JOINT STATEMENT
ON DISCOVERY ISSUES
ry
ong
l
r
and
ons
k
r,
1 discover letter, alo with all pertinent responses a objectio by Black & Decker and
et
er
r
tion
ounsel settin forth me and
ng
eet
2 any mee and confe letters and emails, or a declarat from co
c
tions, that are necessar to unders
a
ry
stand the pa
arties’ curre position on
ent
ns
3 confer communicat
t
ddition, as to requests (iv) and (v) above, if G
t
)
Gardensens
sor
4 each of the issues raised. In ad
in
nts
en
rly
d,
lack & Dec
cker’s
5 contends that certai documen have bee improper redacted or that Bl
ion
onse
s
nt,
ensor must
6 producti in respo to any documents requests is insufficien Gardense
perly redacte documen and the document r
ed
nts
requests at issue. By t
the
7 identify the improp
eadline, Gar
rdensensor must also file a detaile proposed order setti forth the relief
m
fi
ed
d
ing
e
8 same de
9 sought.
10
0
IT IS SO OR
T
RDERED.
11
1
Date: Septem
mber 8, 2014
4
12
2
_____
_________
__________
____
Nath
hanael M. C
Cousins
Unit States M
ted
Magistrate J
Judge
13
3
14
4
15
5
16
6
17
7
18
8
19
9
20
0
21
1
22
2
23
3
24
4
25
5
26
6
27
7
28
8
Case No. 12-cv-0392 NC
22
ORDER RE: JOINT STATEME
R
T
ENT
ON DISC
COVERY IS
SSUES
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?