Gardensensor, Inc v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc

Filing 95

ORDER RE: JOINT STATEMENT ON DISCOVERY ISSUES. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 9/8/2014. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 GARDENSENSOR, INC., a Delaware 12 13 Corporation, formerly known as PLANTSENSE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, 14 15 Case No. 12-cv-03922 NC ORDER RE: JOINT STATEMENT ON DISCOVERY ISSUES Re: Dkt. No. 94 v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.), INC., a 16 Maryland Corporation, 17 Defendant. 18 19 On September 5, 2014, the last day to file letter briefs, the parties filed a joint 20 statement on discovery issues in which plaintiff Gardensensor “seeks an order directing that 21 by September 12, 2014, Defendant: (i) produce employees’ performance evaluations for the 22 PlantSmart project; (ii) respond to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories Nos. 1, 5, 6, 12-15, and 17; (iii) 23 confirm that documents cannot be retrieved from Ansell’s assistant’s deleted files; (iv) 24 produce unredacted versions of all documents containing improper redactions; (v) confirm 25 that Defendant has otherwise produced all responsive documents in its possession; and (vi) 26 provide any further relief that the Court deems proper.” Dkt. No. 94. 27 By September 9, 2014, Gardensensor must file a copy of all discovery requests for 28 which it is seeking to compel further responses or document production in the pending Case No. 12-cv-03922 NC ORDER RE: JOINT STATEMENT ON DISCOVERY ISSUES ry ong l r and ons k r, 1 discover letter, alo with all pertinent responses a objectio by Black & Decker and et er r tion ounsel settin forth me and ng eet 2 any mee and confe letters and emails, or a declarat from co c tions, that are necessar to unders a ry stand the pa arties’ curre position on ent ns 3 confer communicat t ddition, as to requests (iv) and (v) above, if G t ) Gardensens sor 4 each of the issues raised. In ad in nts en rly d, lack & Dec cker’s 5 contends that certai documen have bee improper redacted or that Bl ion onse s nt, ensor must 6 producti in respo to any documents requests is insufficien Gardense perly redacte documen and the document r ed nts requests at issue. By t the 7 identify the improp eadline, Gar rdensensor must also file a detaile proposed order setti forth the relief m fi ed d ing e 8 same de 9 sought. 10 0 IT IS SO OR T RDERED. 11 1 Date: Septem mber 8, 2014 4 12 2 _____ _________ __________ ____ Nath hanael M. C Cousins Unit States M ted Magistrate J Judge 13 3 14 4 15 5 16 6 17 7 18 8 19 9 20 0 21 1 22 2 23 3 24 4 25 5 26 6 27 7 28 8 Case No. 12-cv-0392 NC 22 ORDER RE: JOINT STATEME R T ENT ON DISC COVERY IS SSUES 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?