Frary et al v. County of Marin et al
Filing
19
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting #17 Stipulation to Extend date to respond. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Joseph P. Brent [SBN 214459]
David L. Fiol [SBN 203546]
Brent, Fiol & Nolan LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 259-4420
Facsimile: (415) 373-4420
dfiol@bfnlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Lynnette Frary and
Jamie Ball
Charles A. Bonner [SBN 85413]
A. Cabral Bonner [SBN 247528]
Bonner & Bonner
475 Gate Five Rd, Suite 212
Sausalito, CA 94965
Telephone: 415-331-3070
Facsimile: 415-331-2738
cabral@bonnerlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Heather Howard
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LYNNETTE FRARY, et al.,
15
Plaintiffs,
16
17
18
vs.
COUNTY OF MARIN, et al.,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C12 3928 MEJ
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
AND TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND CASE DEADLINES
Judge:
Hon. Maria-Elena James
WHEREAS, this action was recently filed on July 26, 2012, and service of process was
accomplished expeditiously through waivers of service executed by all named defendants; and
23
WHEREAS, at the time of filing the Court entered an ORDER SETTING INITIAL
24
25
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES establishing a number of
26
discovery and other deadlines and set a Case Management Conference for November 1, 2012,
27
and
28
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER
OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO AMEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND CASE DEADLINES
CASE NO. C12 3928 MEJ
1
WHEREAS, the defendants CITY OF NOVATO, JOSEPH KREINS, OFFICER
2
THOMAS MACKENZIE, OFFICER MICHAEL DUNN, and OFFICER STEPHANIE
3
COMMISTO have filed a motion to dismiss the claims against them pursuant to Federal Rule of
4
Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6), and
5
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS, the defendants COUNTY OF MARIN, SHERIFF ROBERT T. DOYLE,
and DEPUTY RACHEL HAMMER have indicated their intention to also file a motion for
dismissal, but have requested an extension to and through October 9, 2012 to do so, and
WHEREAS, the plaintiffs are agreeable to the extension requested by the County of
10
Marin defendants, and all defendants are in turn agreeable to providing the plaintiffs with
11
additional time to respond to the two motions,
12
Therefore, pursuant to Local Civil Rules Nos. 6-1 and 6-2, the parties hereby agree that
13
14
15
the deadlines and case schedule may be amended as follows:
(1)
Under Local Civil Rule 6-l (a), it is hereby stipulated and agreed between
16
plaintiffs’ counsel and counsel for defendants COUNTY OF MARIN, SHERIFF ROBERT T.
17
DOYLE, and DEPUTY RACHEL HAMMER that said defendants will have to and through
18
October 9, 2012 to file an Answer or other response to the plaintiffs’ complaint; and
19
20
21
(2)
All parties agree that the plaintiffs shall have to and through November 9, 2012 to
file an opposition to any and all Motions to Dismiss filed by the defendants; and
22
(3)
23
December 7, 2012;
24
(4)
Both motions shall be heard on Thursday, January 10 at 10:00 a.m.; and
(5)
In light of the fact that the dispositive motions filed or to be filed by the
25
26
27
28
Any reply papers in response to plaintiffs' oppositions shall be filed no later than
defendants will not be resolved prior to November 1, 2012, the date currently set for the initial
2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER
OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO AMEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND CASE DEADLINES
CASE NO. C12 3928 MEJ
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
3
4
October 2, 2012
Dated: _________________________
5
6
7
____________________________________
Hon. Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER
OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO AMEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND CASE DEADLINES
CASE NO. C12 3928 MEJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?