Frary et al v. County of Marin et al

Filing 19

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting #17 Stipulation to Extend date to respond. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Joseph P. Brent [SBN 214459] David L. Fiol [SBN 203546] Brent, Fiol & Nolan LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 259-4420 Facsimile: (415) 373-4420 dfiol@bfnlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Lynnette Frary and Jamie Ball Charles A. Bonner [SBN 85413] A. Cabral Bonner [SBN 247528] Bonner & Bonner 475 Gate Five Rd, Suite 212 Sausalito, CA 94965 Telephone: 415-331-3070 Facsimile: 415-331-2738 cabral@bonnerlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Heather Howard 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LYNNETTE FRARY, et al., 15 Plaintiffs, 16 17 18 vs. COUNTY OF MARIN, et al., Defendants. 19 20 21 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. C12 3928 MEJ STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CASE DEADLINES Judge: Hon. Maria-Elena James WHEREAS, this action was recently filed on July 26, 2012, and service of process was accomplished expeditiously through waivers of service executed by all named defendants; and 23 WHEREAS, at the time of filing the Court entered an ORDER SETTING INITIAL 24 25 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES establishing a number of 26 discovery and other deadlines and set a Case Management Conference for November 1, 2012, 27 and 28 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. C12 3928 MEJ 1 WHEREAS, the defendants CITY OF NOVATO, JOSEPH KREINS, OFFICER 2 THOMAS MACKENZIE, OFFICER MICHAEL DUNN, and OFFICER STEPHANIE 3 COMMISTO have filed a motion to dismiss the claims against them pursuant to Federal Rule of 4 Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6), and 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, the defendants COUNTY OF MARIN, SHERIFF ROBERT T. DOYLE, and DEPUTY RACHEL HAMMER have indicated their intention to also file a motion for dismissal, but have requested an extension to and through October 9, 2012 to do so, and WHEREAS, the plaintiffs are agreeable to the extension requested by the County of 10 Marin defendants, and all defendants are in turn agreeable to providing the plaintiffs with 11 additional time to respond to the two motions, 12 Therefore, pursuant to Local Civil Rules Nos. 6-1 and 6-2, the parties hereby agree that 13 14 15 the deadlines and case schedule may be amended as follows: (1) Under Local Civil Rule 6-l (a), it is hereby stipulated and agreed between 16 plaintiffs’ counsel and counsel for defendants COUNTY OF MARIN, SHERIFF ROBERT T. 17 DOYLE, and DEPUTY RACHEL HAMMER that said defendants will have to and through 18 October 9, 2012 to file an Answer or other response to the plaintiffs’ complaint; and 19 20 21 (2) All parties agree that the plaintiffs shall have to and through November 9, 2012 to file an opposition to any and all Motions to Dismiss filed by the defendants; and 22 (3) 23 December 7, 2012; 24 (4) Both motions shall be heard on Thursday, January 10 at 10:00 a.m.; and (5) In light of the fact that the dispositive motions filed or to be filed by the 25 26 27 28 Any reply papers in response to plaintiffs' oppositions shall be filed no later than defendants will not be resolved prior to November 1, 2012, the date currently set for the initial 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. C12 3928 MEJ 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 3 4 October 2, 2012 Dated: _________________________ 5 6 7 ____________________________________ Hon. Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CASE DEADLINES CASE NO. C12 3928 MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?