Bauldry v. Town of Danville et al

Filing 200

ORDER granting 199 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to continue opposition and reply deadlines filed by Lane Bauldry. Reset Deadlines as to 198 Amended MOTION for Reconsideration re 197 Joint MOTION for Reconsideration of the Court's Denial of Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's 4th Amendment Claims, Related Conspiracy Claims, and State Wrongful Arrest Claim Pursuant to FRCP. Responses due by 7/9/2015. Replies due by 7/16/2015. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/7/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

MATTHEW D. HALEY (Bar No. 104493)
THE HALEY LAW OFFICES
1633 San Pablo Avenue
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
FULVIO F. CAJINA (Bar No. 289126)
LAW OFFICE OF FULVIO F. CAJINA
311 Oak Street, Suite 108
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

)
)
) Case No.: 3:12-cv-03943-CRB
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
) JOINT STIPULATION TO
TOWN OF DANVILLE, COUNTY OF
) CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO
CONTRA COSTA, CITY OF
PIEDMONT, government entities; MONA ) FILE OPPOSITION AND
)
DAGGET, CHRISTOPHER BUTLER,
) REPLIES IN CONNECTION
DEPUTY STEPHEN TANABE,
) WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
DEPUTY TOM HENDERSON,
) FOR RECONSIDERATION; AND
SARGEANT ANDY WELLS, and Does )
) ORDER
1-50, inclusive
)
)
Defendants.
)
---------------------------------------------------LANE BAULDRY, an individual;

24
25
26

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto,
through their respective counsel, that the deadline to submit an opposition to defendants’

27
28

1

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND
REPLIES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION;
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

e

1

motion for reconsideration filed on June 22, 2015 be continued from July 6, 2015 to July

2

9, 2015, and the deadline for the submission of replies be continued from July 13, 2015 to

3

July 16, 2015.
Good cause exists for such continuance given defendants’ filing of an amended

4
5

motion for reconsideration on June 25, 2015.
Such continuance would not delay compliance with any of the deadlines already

6
7

ordered by the Court, including the hearing date for the above motion currently set for

8

July 31, 2015 at 10:00 AM.

9
Respectfully submitted,

10
11
12

Dated: July 2, 2015

13

__/s/ Matthew D. Haley________

MATTHEW D. HALEY
Attorney for Plaintiff LANE BAULDRY

14
15
16
17

Dated: July 2, 2015

18

THE LAW OFFICE OF FULVIO F. CAJINA
__/s/ Fulvio F. Cajina__________

FULVIO F. CAJINA
Attorney for Plaintiff LANE BAULDRY

19
20
21

THE HALEY LAW OFFICES

Dated: July 2, 2015

EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP

22
23

__/s/ Keith R. Schirmer_________

Keith R. Schirmer
Julia Levitskaia
Attorneys for Defendant STEPHEN TANABE

24
25
26
27
28

2

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND
REPLIES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION;
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

e

1

Dated: July 2, 2015

2

SHARON L. ANDERSON
COUNTY COUNSEL
__/s/ D. Cameron Baker_________

3

D. CAMERON BAKER
Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendant TOM HENDERSON

4
5
6
7

ORDER

8
9
10

Upon the foregoing Stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the
filing deadline for the submission of an opposition is continued to July 9, 2015 and the deadline
for the submission of replies is continued to July 16, 2015.

11
12

Dated: July 7, 2015

_________________________________
Charles R. Breyer
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND
REPLIES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION;
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

e