Yost et al v. Dewalt Industrial Tool Co. et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 45 MOTION for Summary Judgment Setting Briefing Schedule filed by Arthur R Yost, Jr. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 20, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2014)

1 Joseph W. Carcione, Jr., Esq. (State Bar No. 56693)
Joshua S. Markowitz, Esq. (State Bar No. 224256)
2 CARCIONE, CATTERMOLE, DOLINSKI,
STUCKY, MARKOWITZ & CARCIONE, L.L.P.
3 1300 S. El Camino Real, Suite 300
San Mateo, CA 94402
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5
Aaron B. Markowitz, Esq. (Cal. SBN 220694)
6 M ARKOWITZ L AW G ROUP
501 Stockton Ave, Ste. 105
7 San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: [phone]
8 Facsimile: [phone]
9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10 Kevin R. Crisp, Esq. (State Bar No. 97504)
HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL, LLP
11 Kevin R. Crisp, Esq.
555 South Flower St., 45th Floor
12 Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]

13 Facsimile: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail];
14
Attorneys for Defendants
15 Black & Decker (U.S) Inc. and Platt Electric Supply, Inc.
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
ARTHUR R. YOST, JR.; ERIKA YOST,

Case No. 12-CV--03969-JST

21
Plaintiffs,
22
vs.
23
DEWALT INDUSTRIAL TOOL CO.;
24 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC.,
DOES 1 TO 100,
25
Defendants.
26 _______________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Dept. 9
Dis. Ct. Judge: Hon. Jon. S. Tigar

27
28
1.
208947 / abm

JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. CV-12-03969-JST

1

WHEREAS on February 10, 2014 defendants filed a motion for partial summary

2 judgment seeking adjudication of Plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages, which is set
3 for hearing on March 27, 2014.
4
5

WHEREAS the “Comments” to United States District Court for the Northern

6 District of California Local Rule 7, which Rule provides the deadlines for oppositions
7 and replies to motions, states: “The time periods set forth in Civil L.R. 7-2 and 7-3
8 regarding notice, response and reply to motions are minimum time periods. For
9 complex motions, parties are encouraged to stipulate to or seek a Court order
10 establishing a longer notice period with correspondingly longer periods for response or
11 reply. See Civil L.R. 1-4 and 1-5.”
12
13

THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

14

1.

Plaintiffs’ opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment set for

15 hearing on March 27, 2014 shall be filed and served through the Court’s CM/ECF no
16 later than March 10, 2014.
17

2.

Defendants’ reply to Plaintiff’s opposition shall be filed and served

18 through the Court’s CM/ECF no later than March 20, 2014.
19
20

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

21
22

Dated: February 18, 2014

CARCIONE, CATTERMOLE , DOLINSKI,
STUCKY , MARKOWITZ & CARCIONE, LLP

23

By: /s/ Joseph W. Carcione, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

24
25 Dated: February 18, 2014

HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL, LLP

26

By: /s/ Kevin Crisp, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants
Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. and
Platt Electrical Supply, Inc.

27
28

2.
208947 / abm

JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. CV-12-03969-JST

1 Dated: February 18, 2014

MARKOWITZ LAW GROUP

2

By: /s/ Aaron B. Markowitz, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

3
4
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
The hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to April 17, 2014 at
6 2:00 p.m.

ER

14

R NIA

. Ti ga r

FO

nS
J u d ge J o

H

13

RT

12

NO

11

IT IS
DIFIED
AS MO

LI

10

_______________________________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
ED
Judge of O ORDER
S the District Court

A

9

UNIT
ED

8 Dated: February 20, 2014

RT
U
O

S

7

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3.
208947 / abm

JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. CV-12-03969-JST