Yost et al v. Dewalt Industrial Tool Co. et al
Filing
54
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 53 JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time for Expert Designation filed by Arthur R Yost, Jr. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 13, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2014)
1 Joseph W. Carcione, Jr., Esq. (State Bar No. 56693)
CARCIONE, CATTERMOLE, DOLINSKI,
2 STUCKY, MARKOWITZ & CARCIONE, L.L.P.
E-mail: carcionelaw@yahoo.com
3 1300 S. El Camino Real, Suite 300
P.O. Box 5429
4 San Mateo, CA 94402
Telephone: (650) 367-6811
5 Facsimile: (650) 367-0367
6 Aaron B. Markowitz, Esq. (State Bar No. 220694)
MARKOWITZ LAW GROUP
7 E-mail: abm@markowitzlawgroup.com
501 Stockton Avenue, Suite 105
8 San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: (408) 642-5937
9 Facsimile: (408) 516-9576
10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16 ARTHUR R. YOST, JR.; ERIKA YOST,
Case No. CV-12-03969-JST
17
[Assigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar]
Plaintiffs,
18 vs.
19 DEWALT INDUSTRIAL TOOL CO.;
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC., DOES
20 1 TO 100,
21
Defendants.
_______________________________/
22
Related Case:
Yost v. Rohm Co., Ltd.
No. 4:13-cv-5203-JST
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME FOR EXPERT DESIGNATION
[Civil L. R. 6-2, 7-12]
23
WHEREAS on October 23, 2012, this Court set the following deadlines for discovery:
24
Last Day for Expert Disclosures:
December 3, 2013
25
26
AND WHEREAS on July 3, 2013, this Court modified the schedule pursuant to
27 stipulation of the parties as follows:
28
212264 /
Initial Expert Disclosures by:
November 15, 2013
1.
Joint Stipulation of the Parties and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Expert Designation
1
AND WHEREAS on October 16, 2013, this Court modified the schedule pursuant to
2 stipulation of the parties as follows:
3
Initial Expert Disclosures by:
December 16, 2013
4
5
AND WHEREAS on December 10, 2013, this Court modified the schedule pursuant to
6 stipulation of the parties as follows:
7
Initial Expert Disclosures by:
March 7, 2014
8
9
AND WHEREAS on February 28, 2014, this Court modified the schedule pursuant to
10 stipulation of the parties as follows:
11
Initial Expert Disclosures by:
March 17, 2014
12
13
AND WHEREAS the parties have completed non-expert discovery, but need an
14 additional ten (10) days for their experts to finish their reports and complete their designations.
15
16
AND WHEREAS the parties do not believe that this additional time for expert
17 disclosures and reports will affect the trial date or any other deadlines in this matter.
18
19
AND WHEREAS Judge Ronald Sabraw (Retired) is mediating this case and believes
20 that delaying the expert disclosures by ten (10) days may help facilitate a resolution of this case
21 by way of settlement.
22 ///
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
212264 /
2.
Joint Stipulation of the Parties and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Expert Designation
1
THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
2
1.
The parties jointly ask this Court to Amend the Scheduling Order in this manner
3 as follows:
4
Initial Expert Disclosures by:
5
2.
March 27, 2014
All other dates to remain the same.
6
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
9 Dated: March 12, 2014
CARCIONE, CATTERMOLE, DOLINSKI,
STUCKY , MARKOWITZ & CARCIONE, LLP
10
11
By:
Joseph W. Carcione, Jr.
Joshua S. Markowitz
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Arthur R. Yost, Jr. and Erika Yost
12
13
14
15
16 Dated: March 12, 2014
HAIGHT , BROWN & BONESTEEL, LLP
17
18
By:
Kevin R. Crisp
Lee Marshall
Jeffrey A. Vinnick
Attorney for Defendants
Stanley Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. and
Platt Electrical Supply, Inc.
19
20
21
S
25 Dated: March 13, 2014
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
R NIA
24
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
Judge, United States District Court
RT
ER
Ti ga r
3.
A
H
28
n S.
J u d ge J o
FO
NO
27
LI
26
212264 /
RT
U
O
23
S DISTRICT
TE
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
C
TA
UNIT
ED
22
N
D IS T IC T
R
Joint Stipulation of the Parties and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time for Expert Designation
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?