The Estate of Kenneth Harding Jr. et al v. The City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
63
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 61 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/21/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194
Chief Trial Deputy
SEAN F. CONNOLLY, State Bar #152235
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
(415) 554-3863 [Connolly]
Facsimile:
(415) 554-3837
Email:
sean.connolly@sfgov.org
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
MATTHEW LOPEZ, and RICHARD HASTINGS
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
THE ESTATE OF KENNETH HARDING Jr.;
DENIKA CHATMAN, individually and as
personal representative of the ESTATE OF
KENNETH HARDING, Jr.
Case No. C12-3978 WHO
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Trial Date:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
a municipal corporation;
OFFICER MATTHEW LOPEZ individually
and in his official capacity as a Police Officer
for CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; OFFICER RICHARD
HASTINGS individually and in his official
capacity as a Police Officer for CITY AND
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; DOES 1-50,
inclusive; individually and in their official
capacities as POLICE OFFICERS for CITY
AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order
Harding v. CCSF; Case No. 12-cv-3978 WHO
1
Not Set
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) the parties have met and conferred and agree
2
that the discovery of CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION in this matter be made pursuant to the terms
3
of this PROTECTIVE ORDER.
4
5
6
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the parties stipulate, though their attorneys of record, to the
entry of an order as follows:
1.
CONFIDENTIAL, within the meaning of this PROTECTIVE ORDER, shall mean any
7
information which is in the possession of a Designating Party who believes in good faith that such
8
information is entitled to confidential treatment under applicable law. CONFIDENTIAL
9
MATERIALS means any Documents, Testimony or Information as defined below designated as
10
CONFIDENTIAL pursuant to the provisions of this PROTECTIVE ORDER. DOCUMENTS means
11
(i) any “Writing”, “Original”, and “Duplicate” as those terms are defined by the California Evidence
12
Code Sections 250, 255, and 260 which have been produced in discovery in this Proceeding by any
13
person, and (ii) any copies, reproductions, or summaries of all or any part of the foregoing.
14
INFORMATION means the contents of TESTIMONY or DOCUMENTS. TESTIMONY means all
15
depositions, declarations or other testimony taken or used in this Proceeding. The Designating Party
16
shall have the right to designate as CONFIDENTIAL any DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION OR
17
TESTIMONY that the Designating Party in good faith believes to contain non-public information that
18
is entitled to confidential treatment under applicable law. The entry of this PROTECTIVE ORDER
19
does not alter, waive, modify, or abridge any right, privilege or protection otherwise available to any
20
Party with respect to the discovery of matters, including, but not limited to any Party’s right to assert
21
the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, or other privileges, or any Party’s
22
right to contest any such assertion. The Designating Party shall attempt to stamp “Confidential” on all
23
such documents prior to production. In the event that any CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION is
24
inadvertently not stamped as “Confidential,” the party who notices this oversight shall immediately
25
make it known to the other parties and the documents shall immediately be stamped as “Confidential”
26
and treated as such, as per this order.
27
28
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, within the meaning of this PROTECTIVE ORDER, shall
also include any and all documents containing peace officer Personnel Information, private
Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order
Harding v. CCSF; Case No. 12-cv-3978 WHO
2
1
information, confidential information, including any and all records made pursuant to citizen
2
complaint, or other administrative or internal Department investigation, that a Designating Party
3
considers in good faith to be or to contain Confidential, Official Information, or otherwise protected
4
information, shall be subject to this Order and stamped or otherwise designated “Confidential.”
5
2.
The Non-Designating Party may challenge the Designating Party’s designation of a
6
particular document as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by filing an appropriate motion, under
7
seal, with the Court. The parties agree that the prevailing party in a motion to remove the confidential
8
designation shall waive any entitlement to monetary sanctions, including attorney’s fees.
9
3.
Unless disclosure is ordered by the Court, attorneys for a Designating Party shall have
10
the sole authority to determine that materials designated pursuant to this PROTECTIVE ORDER by
11
that Party are no longer considered CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and will advise counsel for
12
the Non-Designating Parties in writing if this determination is made.
13
4.
Any CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION that is disclosed or produced by any party or
14
non-party in connection with this case may be used only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to
15
settle this litigation. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be disclosed only to the categories of
16
persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, all
17
parties or non-parties that have received CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION must comply with the
18
provisions of section Eleven (11), below. All parties or non-parties that have received
19
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION must store and maintain it in a secure manner that ensures that
20
access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.
21
5.
A Non-Designating Party may exhibit, discuss, and/or disclose CONFIDENTIAL
22
INFORMATION only to the following categories of person and no other unless authorized by order of
23
the Court:
24
a.
the Non-Designating Party’s Counsel;
25
b.
Those partners, employees and agents of a Non-Designating Party that counsel
26
for such party deems necessary to aid counsel in the prosecution and defense of this
27
Proceeding. This is provided that prior to the Disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS
28
such individual agrees to comply with the terms of this PROTECTIVE ORDER by executing
Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order
Harding v. CCSF; Case No. 12-cv-3978 WHO
3
1
the document attached as Exhibit A. Counsel shall file and serve that document upon its
2
execution.
c.
3
Experts, investigators or consultants retained by a Non-Designating Party to
4
assist in the evaluation, preparation, or trial of this case; however, before any expert,
5
investigator, or consultant is permitted to review the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, such
6
individual must agree to comply with the terms of this PROTECTIVE ORDER by executing
7
the document attached as Exhibit A. The Non-Designating Party’s counsel shall file and serve
8
that document upon its execution; however, the Non-Designating Party’s counsel shall not be
9
required to file any Agreement to Comply any earlier than the date that Expert Disclosures are
10
required to be made. Experts, investigators, and consultants shall not have any power to
11
authorize further disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to any other person.
12
6.
Counsel for Plaintiff may not provide originals or copies of the CONFIDENTIAL
13
INFORMATION to any plaintiff absent the written agreement of counsel for defendants or a court
14
order, subject to the following:
15
a.
For purposes of evaluating the settlement value or potential jury verdict, counsel
16
for Plaintiff may discuss the general nature of the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION with
17
Plaintiff without disclosing any identifying details about a specific witness or any documents.
18
Plaintiff’s counsel may also review with Plaintiff any statement or interview given by Plaintiff.
19
7.
Unless otherwise stipulated to by the Designating Party, any use of CONFIDENTIAL
20
INFORMATION or comment on the substance of any CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION in any
21
papers or pleadings filed with the Court, shall be filed under seal pursuant to the Court’s rules and
22
procedures (see Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 79-5). The sealed envelopes shall be
23
endorsed with the caption of this litigation, and an indication of the nature of the contents of the
24
envelopes and a statement substantially in the following form:
25
26
27
“This envelope contains documents that are filed in this case pursuant to a
Protective Order and are not to be opened nor the contents thereof to be
displayed or revealed except by further order of the Court or written consent of
the City and County of San Francisco.”
28
Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order
Harding v. CCSF; Case No. 12-cv-3978 WHO
4
1
8.
In the event any person desires to exhibit documents or disclose CONFIDENTIAL
2
INFORMATION covered under this stipulation during trial or pretrial proceedings, such person shall
3
meet and confer with counsel for the Designating Party to reach an agreement, in accordance with the
4
Court’s rules and procedures, on an appropriate method for disclosure, and if the Designating Party
5
does not agree to such disclosure, such CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall not be disclosed
6
unless authorized by order of the Court. Unless otherwise agreed, transcripts and exhibits that
7
incorporate or reference CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION covered under this stipulation shall be
8
treated as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION that is subject to the provisions of this PROTECTIVE
9
ORDER. The Court Reporter shall mark as “Confidential” any deposition or hearing transcript that
10
contains any CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION or any reference to CONFIDENTIAL
11
INFORMATION.
12
9.
If a party who has received CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION learns that, by
13
inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to any person or in any
14
circumstance not authorized under this PROTECTIVE ORDER, the party must immediately (a) notify
15
counsel for the Designating Party in writing of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to
16
retrieve all copies of the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, (c) inform the person or persons to
17
whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person
18
or persons to execute the document that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
19
10.
Any inadvertent disclosure made in violation of this PROTECTIVE ORDER shall be
20
immediately corrected by the offending party and does not constitute a waiver of the terms of this
21
PROTECTIVE ORDER, except by written agreement of the parties, or further order of this Court.
22
11.
All documents covered by this PROTECTIVE ORDER and copies thereof (including
23
those in the possession of experts, consultants, etc.) will be returned to the Designating Party at the
24
termination of this litigation. On final disposition of this case, counsel for a Non-Designating Party
25
shall within 30 days after the final disposition of this case, without request or further order of this
26
Court, return all CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to counsel of record for the Designating Party in
27
this matter. The provisions of this PROTECTIVE ORDER shall, without further order of the Court,
28
Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order
Harding v. CCSF; Case No. 12-cv-3978 WHO
5
1
continue to be binding after the conclusion of the action, and this Court will have jurisdiction to
2
enforce the terms of this PROTECTIVE ORDER.
3
12.
Should plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ counsel or defendants or defendants’ counsel fail to
4
comply with this PROTECTIVE ORDER, the violating party shall be liable for all costs associated
5
with enforcing this agreement, including but not limited to all attorney fees in amounts to be
6
determined by the Court.
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel and defendants and defendants’ counsel may also be subject to
additional sanctions or remedial measures, such as contempt, evidentiary or terminating sanctions.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: October 20, 2014
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS
Chief Trial Attorney
SEAN F. CONNOLLY
Deputy City Attorneys
11
12
13
14
By: /s/ Sean F. Connolly
SEAN F. CONNOLLY
15
16
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL.
17
18
DATED: October 20, 2014
19
LAW OFFICES OF JAMES P. SEGALLGUTIERREZ
By:
20
21
22
/s/ James P. Segall-Gutierrez
James P. Segall-Gutierrez
Attorney for Plaintiff
*Pursuant to General Order 45, §X.B., the filer of this
document attests that he has received the concurrence of
this signatory to file this document.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order
Harding v. CCSF; Case No. 12-cv-3978 WHO
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order
Harding v. CCSF; Case No. 12-cv-3978 WHO
7
EXHIBIT A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order
Harding v. CCSF; Case No. 12-cv-3978 WHO
8
AGREEMENT TO COMPLY WITH STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
1
2
, have read and understand the Court’s Protective Order for
I,
3
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. I agree to abide by all terms of the Order. In addition, I
4
specifically understand and agree to the following:
5
1.
I will not disclose the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to any other person.
6
2.
I understand that I have no power to authorize any other person to review the
7
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
8
3.
I agree not to make copies of the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
9
4.
I agree to return the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to the counsel for the party
10
that produced it, at or before the conclusion of this litigation.
11
12
AGREED:
13
14
DATE
15
16
SIGNATURE
17
PRINT NAME
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order
Harding v. CCSF; Case No. 12-cv-3978 WHO
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194
Chief Trial Deputy
SEAN F. CONNOLLY, State Bar #152235
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
(415) 554-3863 [Connolly]
Facsimile:
(415) 554-3837
Email:
sean.connolly@sfgov.org
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
MATTHEW LOPEZ, and RICHARD HASTINGS
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
THE ESTATE OF KENNETH HARDING Jr.;
DENIKA CHATMAN, individually and as
personal representative of the ESTATE OF
KENNETH HARDING, Jr.
Case No. C12-3978 EMC
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Plaintiffs,
Trial Date:
Not Set
vs.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
a municipal corporation;
OFFICER MATTHEW LOPEZ individually
and in his official capacity as a Police Officer
for CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; OFFICER RICHARD
HASTINGS individually and in his official
capacity as a Police Officer for CITY AND
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; DOES 1-50,
inclusive; individually and in their official
capacities as POLICE OFFICERS for CITY
AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
Stipulated Protective Order
Harding v. CCSF, et al. Case No. 12-cv-3978 WHO
10
c:\users\lawojsg7\downloads\00935153.doc
ORDER
1
2
3
Based on the above entered Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: October 21, 2014
4
5
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulated Protective Order
Harding v. CCSF, et al. Case No. 12-cv-3978 WHO
11
c:\users\lawojsg7\downloads\00935153.doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?