Snowden v. Rackley
Filing
22
ORDER CONSTRUING DOCKET NO. 20 AS NOTICE OF APPEAL AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/29/2014)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
DARNELL SNOWDEN,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
No. C 12-03983 SI
ORDER CONSTRUING DOCKET NO. 20
AS NOTICE OF APPEAL AND DENYING
WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
v.
R.J. RACKLEY,
Respondent.
/
16
17
The Court has received several pro se filings from petitioner, including an application for an
18
extension of time to file a motion for a certificate of appealability in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
19
The Court construes the filings found at Docket No. 20 as a Notice of Appeal of the August 11, 2014
20
judgment. The Court DENIES the application for extension of time WITHOUT PREJUDICE to
21
petitioner seeking an extension from the Ninth Circuit.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: September 29, 2014
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
