Circle Click Media LLC v. Regus Management Group LLC et al

Filing 174

ORDER ON JOINT LETTER BRIEFS 1 AND 2. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/16/2014. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CIRCLE CLICK MEDIA LLC, et al., Case No. 12-cv-04000-SC (JSC) Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER ON JOINT LETTER BRIEFS 1 AND 2 9 10 REGUS MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, et al., Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Re: Dkt. Nos. 159, 161 12 On March 27, 2014, the Court held a hearing on the discovery disputes set forth in Joint 13 Letter Brief Nos. 1 and 2 (Dkt. Nos. 159, 161). Upon consideration of Joint Letter Brief Nos. 1 14 and 2 and the related exhibits, the oral argument of counsel, and the parties’ competing proposed 15 orders and related filings (Dkt. No. 172), the Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs’ request for relief set 16 forth in Joint Letter Brief Nos. 1 and 2 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, 17 the Court GRANTS the following with respect to Plaintiffs’ First Request for Production of 18 Documents: 19 1. RFP Nos. 3-5, 7-9. Defendants to produce the names of the officers and directors since 20 2006 for all intervening entities between Regus plc and the other defendants in the 21 action, and the same information for the entities listed in RFP Nos. 3-5 and 7-9. 22 Defendants to produce the articles of organization for the entities listed in RFP Nos. 3- 23 5. 24 2. RFP Nos. 12-13. Defendants to produce documents sufficient to show any travel by 25 Dominique Yates and Mark Dixon to California since 2006 in any Regus Group 26 capacity. 27 3. RFP Nos. 24, 26, 28-30. Defendants to produce all Regus plc service agreements, to 28 the extent they exist. Defendants to produce any Regus Business World service 1 agreements with any Defendant, to the extent they exist. 2 4. RFP Nos. 18-20. Defendants to produce one response to a user submission form from 3 the regus.com website from each of the three following time periods: (1) September 4 2010 to March 2011, (2) April 2011 to October 2011, and (3) October 2011 to May 5 2012. 6 5. Metadata. Defendants to produce author, creation date, and custodian metadata fields, 7 to the extent they exist, for all versions of the following documents already produced or 8 produced in response to this Order: 9 10 a. Office Agreements, House Rules, Services Price Guides, and Terms & Conditions; United States District Court Northern District of California 11 b. North America Standard Operating Procedures; 12 c. U.S. Employee Handbook; 13 d. Services agreements. 14 15 16 17 18 19 6. In all other respects, Plaintiffs’ requested relief in Joint Letter Brief Nos. 1 and 2 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 16, 2014 ______________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?