Circle Click Media LLC v. Regus Management Group LLC et al

Filing 203

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on July 31, 2014. (jsclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CIRCLE CLICK MEDIA LLC, et al.,

Case No. 12-cv-04000-SC (JSC)

Plaintiffs,
8
v.

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY LETTER
BRIEF

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

REGUS MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, et
al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 195

Defendants.

12
13

Now pending before the Court is a Joint Discovery Letter Brief wherein Plaintiffs seek to

14

compel further responses to requests for the production of documents. (Dkt. No. 195.) Plaintiffs

15

appear to identify three categories of documents as in dispute: (1) “executed Agreements for

16

California tenants from May 8, 2008, to the present and for New York tenants from September 24,

17

2006,10 to the present”; “(2) all form versions, drafts, and revisions to form Office Agreements,

18

Fine Print, House Rules, and Service Descriptions since January 1, 2003”; and (3) “all

19

communications (including surveys, training presentations, and emails) by or between employees,

20

officers, directors, consultants, in-house counsel, or any other Regus representatives” “referencing

21

or relating to the form of the Agreement, Fine Print, House Rules, and Service Description since

22

January 1, 2003.” (Dkt.No. 195, p. 6.) The letter brief concludes by identifying each party’s

23

proposed compromise. Based on the parties’ respective compromise statements, it is unclear what

24

disputes, if any, remain regarding the documents sought.

25

Accordingly, on or before August 6, 2014, the parties shall file a joint statement of no

26

more than two pages in length which clarifies what, if any, disputes remain. Plaintiffs shall

27

provide Defendants with their written position regarding what issues remain in light of the parties’

28

compromise positions by noon, August 4, 2014. Plaintiffs’ statement shall clearly identify the

1

documents it seeks to compel in its compromise offer and which Defendants have refused to

2

produce and the document request(s) said documents are responsive to. Defendants shall provide

3

Plaintiffs with their response by 9:00 a.m. August 6, 2014. Plaintiffs shall combine these two

4

statements into one document without altering their original statement, although Plaintiffs may

5

add a one paragraph response to Defendants’ statement as necessary, and file the document with

6

the Court by the close of business August 6, 2014.

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 31, 2014
______________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2