Circle Click Media LLC v. Regus Management Group LLC et al
Filing
313
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part #294 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CIRCLE CLICK MEDIA LLC, a
)
California limited liability
)
company, METRO TALENT, LLC, a
)
California limited liability
)
company, and CTNY INSURANCE
)
GROUP LLC, a Connecticut limited )
liability company, on behalf of )
themselves and all others
)
similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
REGUS MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, a
)
Delaware limited liability
)
company; REGUS BUSINESS CENTRE )
LLC, a Delaware limited
)
liability company; REGUS plc, a )
Jersey, Channel Islands public )
limited company; HQ GLOBAL
)
WORKPLACES LLC, a Delaware
)
limited liability company, and )
DOES 1 through 50,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. 3:12-CV-04000-SC
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS'
MOTION TO SEAL
23
24
Plaintiffs filed a motion to seal unredacted versions of
25
Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support
26
of Motion for Class Certification ("Reply") and Reply Declaration
27
of S. Chandler Visher in Support of Motion for Class Certification
28
("Reply Declaration").
ECF No. 294.
Plaintiffs' Reply and Reply
1
Declaration contain information that Defendants have designated as
2
confidential pursuant to a protective order.
3
Rule 79-5(e), Defendants submitted a response supporting some of
4
the confidentiality designations.
5
however, that certain redacted excerpts do not contain confidential
6
information.
7
PART and DENIED in part as described in the table below.
Pursuant to Local
ECF No. 310.
Defendants note,
Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion to seal is GRANTED IN
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
9
10
ECF No. (Description)
34-4 (unredacted Reply)
Ruling on Motion to File Under Seal
DENIED as to page 3, lines 1, 4, 7,
and 9; page 6, line 14; page 12, lines
12 and 15; page 11, line 8; page 15,
lines 22-23
GRANTED IN PART as to all other
redactions
34-6 (unredacted Reply
Declaration of S. Chandler
Visher)
DENIED as to page 7, lines 20-11; and
page 9, lines 6 and 20-24
GRANTED IN PART as to all other
redactions
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
Dated: August 25, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?