Sorensen v. Target Corporation

Filing 63

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certi fy to this Court, within thirty (30) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/5/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 OLGA SORENSEN, et al., Case No. 12-cv-04025-JCS Plaintiffs. 8 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 10 TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; 15 provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within thirty (30) days, with 16 proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said 17 settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall 18 forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 5, 2014 ____________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?