Lane et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

Filing 75

ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 73 Discovery Letter Brief.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

DANNY LANE and BEVERLY LANE,
individually and for all other persons
similarly situated,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20

ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 12-04026 WHA

The Court has received defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s letter regarding discovery
(Dkt. No. 73) and has reviewed plaintiffs’ document request numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, and 25.
Plaintiffs’ document request numbers 20, 21, 22, and 25 are grossly overbroad and
burdensome and are quashed.
Plaintiffs’ document request number 23 borders on being overbroad but the Court will

21

require defendant to produce one exemplar of each marketing and sales document summarizing,

22

describing, or referring to force-placed insurance supplied to borrowers within the period of the

23

statute of limitations.

24

There is no need for a hearing on this matter.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: February 13, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE