Lane et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

Filing 75

ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 73 Discovery Letter Brief.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 DANNY LANE and BEVERLY LANE, individually and for all other persons similarly situated, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant. / 15 16 No. C 12-04026 WHA The Court has received defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s letter regarding discovery (Dkt. No. 73) and has reviewed plaintiffs’ document request numbers 20, 21, 22, 23, and 25. Plaintiffs’ document request numbers 20, 21, 22, and 25 are grossly overbroad and burdensome and are quashed. Plaintiffs’ document request number 23 borders on being overbroad but the Court will 21 require defendant to produce one exemplar of each marketing and sales document summarizing, 22 describing, or referring to force-placed insurance supplied to borrowers within the period of the 23 statute of limitations. 24 There is no need for a hearing on this matter. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: February 13, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?