Lane et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

Filing 79

ORDER PERMITTING DEFENDANT'S SUR-REPLY BRIEF. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 3/13/2013. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

DANNY LANE and BEVERLY LANE,
individually, and for other persons
similarly situated,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14
15

v.

ORDER PERMITTING
DEFENDANT’S
SUR-REPLY BRIEF

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
/

16
17

No. C 12-04026 WHA

Plaintiffs did not assert that they had good cause to amend the scheduling order in their

18

initial motion seeking leave to amend. Defendant may file a sur-reply brief to respond to

19

plaintiffs’ assertions of good cause raised in their reply brief. Defendant’s sur-reply brief shall

20

not exceed five pages and must be submitted by NOON ON THURSDAY, MARCH 14, 2013.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: March 13, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE