Arroyo v. Pfizer, Inc.
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER To Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint and Continue Case Management Conference filed by Pfizer, Inc., 15 MOTION to Dismiss PFIZER, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6), 9(b), AND 12(b)(1); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITIES filed by Pfizer, Inc... Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/19/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2012)
7
Melissa D. Ingalls (SBN 174861)
melissa.ingalls@kirkland.com
Robyn E. Bladow (SBN 205189)
robyn.bladow@kirkland.com
Shaun Paisley (SBN 244377)
shaun.paisley@kirkland.com
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (213) 680-8400
Facsimile: (213) 680-8500
8
Attorneys for Defendant Pfizer, Inc.
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
JOANNE ARROYO, on behalf of themselves )
)
and all others similarly situated,
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PFIZER, INC., a Delaware corporation,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 12-04030 EMC
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Hearing Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
November 9, 2012
9:00 a.m.
5
Case Filed: July 31, 2012
Trial Date: TBD
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. CV 12-04030 EMC
1
On October 17, 2012, Plaintiff Joanne Arroyo and Defendant Pfizer, Inc. submitted a
2
stipulation to continue the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for November 9, 2012.
3
After considering the stipulation, and for good cause shown:
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
5
(1)
The Case Management Conference, which was previously scheduled for November 9,
6
2012, shall be continued until after the Court rules on Pfizer’s forthcoming Motion to Dismiss
7
Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint; and
8
(2)
January 17, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.
The time for Pfizer to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is extended by
21 days, such that Pfizer’s response is now due on or before November 13, 2012.
10
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
S
18
ER
R NIA
dward
Judge E
H
17
RT
16
NO
15
n
M. Che
FO
14
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO
LI
13
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
A
12
19
DATED: October ___, 2012
UNIT
ED
11
RT
U
O
9
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. CV 12-04030 EMC
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on October 17, 2012, I electronically filed the [PROPOSED] ORDER
3
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO
4
RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system,
5
which will automatically send an e-mail notification of such filing to the attorneys of record who are
6
registered CM/ECF users.
7
Executed on October 17, 2012, at Los Angeles, California.
8
9
10
11
Respectfully submitted,
s/Robyn E. Bladow
14
Melissa D. Ingalls
Robyn E. Bladow
Shaun Paisley
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
15
Attorneys for Defendant Pfizer, Inc.
12
13
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. CV 12-04030 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?