Arroyo v. Pfizer, Inc.

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER To Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint and Continue Case Management Conference filed by Pfizer, Inc., 15 MOTION to Dismiss PFIZER, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6), 9(b), AND 12(b)(1); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITIES filed by Pfizer, Inc... Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/19/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2012)

Download PDF
7 Melissa D. Ingalls (SBN 174861) melissa.ingalls@kirkland.com Robyn E. Bladow (SBN 205189) robyn.bladow@kirkland.com Shaun Paisley (SBN 244377) shaun.paisley@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 680-8400 Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 8 Attorneys for Defendant Pfizer, Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 JOANNE ARROYO, on behalf of themselves ) ) and all others similarly situated, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PFIZER, INC., a Delaware corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 12-04030 EMC The Honorable Edward M. Chen [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Hearing Date: Time: Courtroom: November 9, 2012 9:00 a.m. 5 Case Filed: July 31, 2012 Trial Date: TBD 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. CV 12-04030 EMC 1 On October 17, 2012, Plaintiff Joanne Arroyo and Defendant Pfizer, Inc. submitted a 2 stipulation to continue the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for November 9, 2012. 3 After considering the stipulation, and for good cause shown: 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 5 (1) The Case Management Conference, which was previously scheduled for November 9, 6 2012, shall be continued until after the Court rules on Pfizer’s forthcoming Motion to Dismiss 7 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint; and 8 (2) January 17, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The time for Pfizer to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is extended by 21 days, such that Pfizer’s response is now due on or before November 13, 2012. 10 S DISTRICT TE C TA S 18 ER R NIA dward Judge E H 17 RT 16 NO 15 n M. Che FO 14 DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO LI 13 The Honorable Edward M. Chen A 12 19 DATED: October ___, 2012 UNIT ED 11 RT U O 9 N F D IS T IC T O R C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. CV 12-04030 EMC 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 17, 2012, I electronically filed the [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO 4 RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, 5 which will automatically send an e-mail notification of such filing to the attorneys of record who are 6 registered CM/ECF users. 7 Executed on October 17, 2012, at Los Angeles, California. 8 9 10 11 Respectfully submitted, s/Robyn E. Bladow 14 Melissa D. Ingalls Robyn E. Bladow Shaun Paisley Kirkland & Ellis LLP 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071 15 Attorneys for Defendant Pfizer, Inc. 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. CV 12-04030 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?