Pichardo v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 37

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION VACATING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES 36 . Case Management Conference set for 11/27/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/26/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

DAN SIEGEL, (SBN 56400)
KEVIN BRUNNER, (SBN 271510)
SIEGEL & YEE
499 14th Street, Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ANA PICHARDO
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194
Chief Trial Attorney
BLAKE P. LOEBS, State Bar # 145790
Chief of Civil Rights Litigation
DONALD P. MARGOLIS, State Bar #116588
ELIZABETH PEDERSON, State Bar #288184
Deputy City Attorneys
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone: [phone] [Margolis]
Telephone:
[phone] [Pederson]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

ANA PICHARDO,

21

Plaintiff,

22

vs.

23
24
25

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 12-4042 NC
NOTIFICATION OF PENDING
SETTLEMENT; STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING PRETRIAL
AND TRIAL DATES AND SCHEDULING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Current Pretrial Conf. Date: December 18, 2013
Current Trial Date:
January 13, 2014

26
27
28
Not. of Pending Sett.; Stip/Order Vacating Pretrial/Trial
Dates; Pichardo v. CCSF, et al.; No. 12-4042 NC

1

n:\lit\li2013\130015\00867541.docx

RECITALS

1
2
3
4
5
6

A.

On August 13, 2013, the parties reached agreement on the terms of settlement of this

action, subject to final approval by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.
B.

Counsel for defendant City and County of San Francisco has recommended that the

Board of Supervisors approve the proposed settlement.
C.

Because of a summer recess and the notice and hearing procedures applicable to Board

7

consideration of proposed settlements, defendant’s counsel estimates that the earliest date the parties

8

can be confident they will know whether the Board has given final settlement approval is

9

approximately October 25, 2013.
STIPULATION

10
11

To promote efficiency and economy for the Court, the parties, and counsel, the parties stipulate

12

to the entry of an order: (a) vacating all pretrial dates for cutoff of discovery, the hearing on dispositive

13

motions, meeting and conferring on pretrial matters, submittal of the pretrial statement, the pretrial

14

conference, and trial; and (b) contingently scheduling a case management conference for a date

15

convenient to the Court that is in November 2013, to occur only if final settlement has not occurred.

16

The parties shall file a stipulation for dismissal of the action promptly after any final settlement

17

approval.

18

Dated: August 23, 2013

THE LAW OFFICES OF SIEGEL & YEE

19
By:

20
21

/s/ Kevin Brunner
KEVIN BRUNNER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ANA PICHARDO

22
23

Dated: August 23, 2013

DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney

24
25
26

By:

/s/ Donald P. Margolis
DONALD P. MARGOLIS
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

27
28
Not. of Pending Sett.; Stip/Order Vacating Pretrial/Trial
Dates; Pichardo v. CCSF, et al.; No. 12-4042 NC

2

n:\lit\li2013\130015\00867541.docx

ORDER

1
2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

3

All pretrial dates and deadlines for cutoff of discovery, the hearing on dispositive motions,

4

meeting and conferring on pretrial matters, submittal of the pretrial statement, the pretrial conference;

5

and the trial date, are VACATED.

6

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a further case management conference is set for November

7

__, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. which conference date shall be vacated should the parties earlier file a
27

8

stipulation for dismissal of the action.

.
thanael M
Judge Na

RT

16

GRAN

H

ER

Cousins

17
18

R NIA

15

UNIT
ED

14

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
TED

RT
U
O

13

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

NO

12

S

11

FO

Dated: ______________________
August 26, 2013

LI

10

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

A

9

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Not. of Pending Sett.; Stip/Order Vacating Pretrial/Trial
Dates; Pichardo v. CCSF, et al.; No. 12-4042 NC

3

n:\lit\li2013\130015\00867541.docx