Koga-Smith v. MetLife et al
Filing
66
ORDER Re 65 Joint Letter of March 26, 2013. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/27/2013. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
NAOMI KOGA-SMITH,
9
Plaintiff,
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
10
United States District Court
No. C-12-4050 EMC
METLIFE, et al.,
ORDER RE JOINT LETTER OF
MARCH 26, 2013
(Docket No. 65)
12
Defendants.
13
___________________________________/
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
The parties have submitted a joint letter, dated March 26, 2013, regarding the results of their
meet and confer. Having reviewed the contents of that letter, the Court hereby rules as follows.
1.
MetLife has adequately explained why it has not been able to give to Ms. Carter an
exact date that the wire transfer will be completed.
2.
The Court shall not order MetLife to complete the wire transfer by a date certain
21
because it is not clear whether the transfer can be effected with the information provided by Ms.
22
Carter as of date.
23
3.
However, to ensure that the distribution of proceeds does not languish, the Court shall
24
require the parties to file a joint letter within two weeks of the date of this order to update the
25
Court as to the status of the wire transfer. The Court advises Ms. Carter that, although she believes
26
the IBAN/SWIFT number for the receiving institution is not necessary to effect the wire transfer, it
27
would be in her best interest to provide the information as that would prevent any delay should that
28
1
information, in fact, become necessary to effect the transfer. The Court also notes that Ms. Carter
2
has failed to explain why providing that information would cause her any prejudice or undue burden.
3
This order disposes of Docket No. 65.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: March 27, 2013
8
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?