Carr v. Oakland Housing Authority et al
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Kenneth Nielson, Oakland Housing Authority, Carel J. Duplessis, Oakland Housing Authority Police Department, Joshua Ruiz, N. Mumbower, T. Godfrey Case Management Statement due by 10/31/2013. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/7/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/3/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
400 OYSTER POINT BLVD., SUITE 415
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080
LAW OFFICES OF
CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES
11
12
13
14
GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq. (SBN 109173)
LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET
486 41st Street, Suite 3
Oakland, CA 94609
Telephone and Facsimile: (510) 420-0324
E-Mail: glibet@sbcglobal.net
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KIERON CARR
KEVIN K. CHOLAKIAN (SBN 103423)
BRIAN FINN (SBN 142368)
CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES
A Professional Corporation
400 Oyster Point Blvd., Ste. 415
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Telephone: (650) 871-9544
Facsimile: (650) 871-9552
email: bfinn@cholakian.net
Attorneys for Defendants
OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY, OAKLAND HOUSING
AUTHORITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF CAREL DUPLESSIS,
SERGEANT KENNETH NIELSEN, OFC. JOSHUA RUIZ,
OFC. T. GODFREY AND OFC. N. MUMBOWER
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
) Case No.: 3:12-CV-4051EMC
)
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
) MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
vs.
)
)
)
)
OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY, a
governmental entity; OAKLAND HOUSING )
)
AUTHORITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, a )
governmental entity; CAREL J. DUPLESSIS, )
)
in his capacity as Chief of Police for
)
OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY
POLICE DEPARTMENT; T. GODFREY; N. )
)
MUMBOWER; KENNETH NIELSON,
)
JOSHUA RUIZ; and R. FLORES,
)
)
individually, and in their capacity as police
)
officers for OAKLAND HOUSING
KIERON CARR,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
300 036
-1–
3:12-CV-4051EMC
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
1
2
3
4
AUTHORITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; and )
)
DOES 4-25, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
5
6
All parties to this action stipulate and agree, by and through their respective counsel,
as follows:
7
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
agreement. Defendants are waiting for executed settlement documents from Plaintiff who is
11
400 OYSTER POINT BLVD., SUITE 415
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080
Cousins. The matter was settled on the same day. The parties are finalizing the settlement
10
LAW OFFICES OF
Settlement Conference was held on July 8, 2013 before Magistrate Judge Nathanael
9
CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES
8
currently incarcerated.
12
We request that the Case Management Conference be continued to 90 days.
13
14
15
Dated: August 30, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET
16
By /s/ Gayla B. Libet
GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KIERON CARR
17
18
19
20
Dated: August 30, 2013
21
CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES
A Professional Corporation
22
By___/s/ Brian J. Finn
Brian Finn
Attorneys for Defendants
OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY,
OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT, CHIEF CAREL DUPLESSIS,
SERGEANT KENNETH NIELSEN, OFC.
JOSHUA RUIZ, OFC. T. GODFREY AND OFC.
N. MUMBOWER
23
24
25
26
27
28
300 036
-2–
3:12-CV-4051EMC
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Further CMC is reset
2
S
9/3/13
5
6
EDWARD M. CHEN
UnitedDERED
States District Court Judge
O OR
IT IS S
IFIED
S MOD
A
NO
7
RT
8
dward
Judge E
ER
n
M. Che
10
A
H
9
R NIA
4
FO
UNIT
ED
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
3
for 11/7/13 at 10:30 a.m.
An update joint CMC Statement
shall be filed by 10/31/13.
LI
1
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
400 OYSTER POINT BLVD., SUITE 415
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080
LAW OFFICES OF
CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
300 036
-3–
3:12-CV-4051EMC
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?