Carr v. Oakland Housing Authority et al

Filing 49

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Kenneth Nielson, Oakland Housing Authority, Carel J. Duplessis, Oakland Housing Authority Police Department, Joshua Ruiz, N. Mumbower, T. Godfrey Case Management Statement due by 10/31/2013. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/7/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/3/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD., SUITE 415 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 LAW OFFICES OF CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES 11 12 13 14 GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq. (SBN 109173) LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET 486 41st Street, Suite 3 Oakland, CA 94609 Telephone and Facsimile: (510) 420-0324 E-Mail: glibet@sbcglobal.net Attorneys for Plaintiff KIERON CARR KEVIN K. CHOLAKIAN (SBN 103423) BRIAN FINN (SBN 142368) CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES A Professional Corporation 400 Oyster Point Blvd., Ste. 415 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Telephone: (650) 871-9544 Facsimile: (650) 871-9552 email: bfinn@cholakian.net Attorneys for Defendants OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY, OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF CAREL DUPLESSIS, SERGEANT KENNETH NIELSEN, OFC. JOSHUA RUIZ, OFC. T. GODFREY AND OFC. N. MUMBOWER 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 ) Case No.: 3:12-CV-4051EMC ) ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE ) MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE vs. ) ) ) ) OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY, a governmental entity; OAKLAND HOUSING ) ) AUTHORITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, a ) governmental entity; CAREL J. DUPLESSIS, ) ) in his capacity as Chief of Police for ) OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; T. GODFREY; N. ) ) MUMBOWER; KENNETH NIELSON, ) JOSHUA RUIZ; and R. FLORES, ) ) individually, and in their capacity as police ) officers for OAKLAND HOUSING KIERON CARR, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 300 036 -1– 3:12-CV-4051EMC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT 1 2 3 4 AUTHORITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; and ) ) DOES 4-25, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) 5 6 All parties to this action stipulate and agree, by and through their respective counsel, as follows: 7 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION agreement. Defendants are waiting for executed settlement documents from Plaintiff who is 11 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD., SUITE 415 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 Cousins. The matter was settled on the same day. The parties are finalizing the settlement 10 LAW OFFICES OF Settlement Conference was held on July 8, 2013 before Magistrate Judge Nathanael 9 CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES 8 currently incarcerated. 12 We request that the Case Management Conference be continued to 90 days. 13 14 15 Dated: August 30, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET 16 By /s/ Gayla B. Libet GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff KIERON CARR 17 18 19 20 Dated: August 30, 2013 21 CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES A Professional Corporation 22 By___/s/ Brian J. Finn Brian Finn Attorneys for Defendants OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY, OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF CAREL DUPLESSIS, SERGEANT KENNETH NIELSEN, OFC. JOSHUA RUIZ, OFC. T. GODFREY AND OFC. N. MUMBOWER 23 24 25 26 27 28 300 036 -2– 3:12-CV-4051EMC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Further CMC is reset 2 S 9/3/13 5 6 EDWARD M. CHEN UnitedDERED States District Court Judge O OR IT IS S IFIED S MOD A NO 7 RT 8 dward Judge E ER n M. Che 10 A H 9 R NIA 4 FO UNIT ED Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 3 for 11/7/13 at 10:30 a.m. An update joint CMC Statement shall be filed by 10/31/13. LI 1 N D IS T IC T R OF C A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 400 OYSTER POINT BLVD., SUITE 415 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 LAW OFFICES OF CHOLAKIAN & ASSOCIATES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 300 036 -3– 3:12-CV-4051EMC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?