Vargas v. Redfern et al

Filing 31

ORDER granting 30 STIPULATION RE: CMC & Responsive Pleading to Complaint filed by Marcos Vargas. Case Management Conference reset for 6/13/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/31/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STAN S. MALLISON (SBN 184191) stanm@themmlawfirm.com HECTOR R. MARTINEZ (SBN 206336) hectorm@themmlawfirm.com MARCO A. PALAU (SBN 242340) mpalau@themmlawfirm.com JOSEPH D. SUTTON (SBN 269951) jsutton@themmlawfirm.com MALLISON & MARTINEZ 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 730 Oakland, California 94612-3547 Telephone: (510) 832-9999 Facsimile: (510) 832-1101 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 MARLENE S. MURACO, Bar No. 154240 mmuraco@littler.com 9 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 10 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor San Jose, California 95113.2303 11 Telephone: 408.998.4150 Facsimile: 408.288.5686 12 Attorneys for Defendants, JOHN EARL REDFERN, J. REDFERN, INC., 13 dba GOLDEN STATE LANDSCAPING; JLS 14 PARTNERS, INC., dba GSL CONSTRUCTION, EMPIRE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA--SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARCOS VARGAS, ROMUALDO ALTAMIRANO, PEDRO RAMOS, BULMARO BAZAN, MARCOS MANDUJANO, JOSE: SOLIS, LUIS PENA, BENITO CHAIREZ, FIGUEROA, FREDY ROCHA, SALVADOR FLORES, ISMAEL CORONA, EPIGMENIO LOPEZ, JUAN CORONA, ENRIQUE TAMAYO, FRANCISCO SALGADO, SILVERIO TORRES, MARTIN RAMOS RAMIREZ, ANGEL SANCHEZ, ERON LOPEZ, EDUARDO VARGAS, JORGE SOTO, RIGOBERTO SANCHEZ, JULIO LOPEZ, JOSE J. GARCIA, PEDRO SIERRA, DAMACIO SANCHEZ, JUAN GUERRA, JAIME MARTINEZ JR., ROBERT MONTOYA, MATEO GUZMAN, LAZARO MAYA, JOSE ESTRADA, ANICETO ALMANZA SANCHEZ, EMILIO VARGAS, Case No.: 3:12-cv-04052-CRB JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT 1 2 3 4 5 JOSE ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH RENEE RODRIGUEZ, MAURICIO SANCHEZ, MAURICIO SANCHEZ ARZATE, MANUEL RENTERIA, MIGUEL SUCHIL MENDOZA, and VICENTE MARTINEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 6 7 8 9 10 11 v. JOHN EARL REDFERN, an individual; J. REDFERN, INC., (dba "GOLDEN STATE LANDSCAPING"), a California Corporation; JLS PARTNERS, INC., (dba "GSL CONSTRUCTION"), a California Corporation; and EMPIRE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION, a California Corporation, 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Plaintiffs Marcos Vargas, Romualdo Altamirano, Pedro Ramos, Bulmaro Bazan, Marcos 16 Mandujano, Jose Solis, Luis Pena, Benito Chairez, Figueroa, Fredy Rocha, Salvador Flores, 17 Ismael Corona, Epigmenio Lopez, Juan Corona, Enrique Tamayo, Francisco Salgado, Silverio 18 Torres, Martin Ramos Ramirez, Angel Sanchez, Eron Lopez, Eduardo Vargas, Jorge Soto, 19 Rigoberto Sanchez, Julio Lopez, Jose J. Garcia, Pedro Sierra, Damacio Sanchez, Juan Guerra, 20 Jaime Martinez Jr., Robert Montoya, Mateo Guzman, Lazaro Maya, Jose Estrada, Aniceto 21 Almanza Sanchez, Emilio Vargas, Jose Antonio Alvarez, Antonio Rodriguez, Joseph Renee 22 Rodriguez, Mauricio Sanchez, Mauricio Sanchez Arzate, Manuel Renteria, Miguel Suchil 23 Mendoza, and Vicente Martinez, (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants John Earl Redfern, J. 24 Redfern, Inc. (dba Golden State Landscaping), JLS Partners, Inc. (dba GSL Construction), and 25 Empire Landscape Construction (collectively “Defendants”) agree and stipulate, through their 26 respective counsel, to the following extension: 27 1. The parties have finalized and signed settlement agreements for both the related 28 state court matter (Jose Moreno et al v. J. Redfern, Inc. et al., Alameda Co. Superior Court Case 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT 1 No. RG08375539) and this matter. 2 2. The parties have made request for dismissal in this matter contingent upon the 3 state court granting final approval of the proposed settlement in the Moreno action. Per the 4 settlement agreement in this matter, Plaintiffs agree to deliver to counsel for Defendants a fully 5 executed Request for Dismissal within five (5) calendar days of the date on which the Alameda 6 Superior Court grant final approval of the proposed settlement in the Moreno matter. 7 3. The proposed class action settlement in the Moreno matter was granted 8 preliminary approval by Judge Robert Freeman of the Alameda Superior Court on December 20, 9 2014. 10 4. The Final Approval Hearing in the Moreno matter has been set for April 25, 2014. 11 5. As such, the parties have agreed to continue the deadline for Defendants’ 12 responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ complaint from January 16, 2014 to May 27, 2014. 13 6. The parties also request that the initial Case Management Conference in this 14 matter be continued from February 7, 2014 to June 13, 2014. 15 16 Dated: January __, 2014 /s/ Joseph D. Sutton LAW OFFICES OF MALLISON & MARTINEZ 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 19 20 21 22 Dated: January __, 2014 /s/ Marlene Muraco 23 LITTLER MENDELSON A Professional Corporation 24 Attorneys for Defendants 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT 1 2 ORDER PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND FOR GOOD CAUSE 3 APPEARING, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS: 4 1. That the deadline for Defendants’ responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ complaint be 5 continued from January 16, 2014 to May 27, 2014. 6 2. That the initial Case Management Conference in this matter be continued from 7 February 7, 2014 to June 13, 2014. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 S R NIA United States District CourtyJudge er R. Bre Charles Judge FO ER H 15 O The Honorable Charles R. Breyer RT 14 O IT IS S NO 13 D _________________________________ RDERE LI 12 Dated: January 31, 2014 A 11 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 10 UNIT ED 9 N D IS T IC T R OF C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?