Vargas v. Redfern et al
Filing
31
ORDER granting 30 STIPULATION RE: CMC & Responsive Pleading to Complaint filed by Marcos Vargas. Case Management Conference reset for 6/13/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/31/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
STAN S. MALLISON (SBN 184191)
stanm@themmlawfirm.com
HECTOR R. MARTINEZ (SBN 206336)
hectorm@themmlawfirm.com
MARCO A. PALAU (SBN 242340)
mpalau@themmlawfirm.com
JOSEPH D. SUTTON (SBN 269951)
jsutton@themmlawfirm.com
MALLISON & MARTINEZ
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 730
Oakland, California 94612-3547
Telephone: (510) 832-9999
Facsimile: (510) 832-1101
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8 MARLENE S. MURACO, Bar No. 154240
mmuraco@littler.com
9
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
10 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor
San Jose, California 95113.2303
11 Telephone: 408.998.4150
Facsimile: 408.288.5686
12 Attorneys for Defendants,
JOHN EARL REDFERN, J. REDFERN, INC.,
13
dba GOLDEN STATE LANDSCAPING; JLS
14 PARTNERS, INC., dba GSL CONSTRUCTION,
EMPIRE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA--SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MARCOS VARGAS, ROMUALDO
ALTAMIRANO, PEDRO RAMOS,
BULMARO BAZAN, MARCOS
MANDUJANO, JOSE: SOLIS, LUIS PENA,
BENITO CHAIREZ, FIGUEROA, FREDY
ROCHA, SALVADOR FLORES, ISMAEL
CORONA, EPIGMENIO LOPEZ, JUAN
CORONA, ENRIQUE TAMAYO,
FRANCISCO SALGADO, SILVERIO
TORRES, MARTIN RAMOS RAMIREZ,
ANGEL SANCHEZ, ERON LOPEZ,
EDUARDO VARGAS, JORGE SOTO,
RIGOBERTO SANCHEZ, JULIO LOPEZ,
JOSE J. GARCIA, PEDRO SIERRA,
DAMACIO SANCHEZ, JUAN GUERRA,
JAIME MARTINEZ JR., ROBERT
MONTOYA, MATEO GUZMAN, LAZARO
MAYA, JOSE
ESTRADA, ANICETO
ALMANZA SANCHEZ, EMILIO VARGAS,
Case No.: 3:12-cv-04052-CRB
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND RESPONSIVE
PLEADING TO COMPLAINT
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
JOSE ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ANTONIO
RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH RENEE
RODRIGUEZ, MAURICIO SANCHEZ,
MAURICIO SANCHEZ ARZATE, MANUEL
RENTERIA, MIGUEL SUCHIL MENDOZA,
and VICENTE
MARTINEZ, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
6
7
8
9
10
11
v.
JOHN EARL REDFERN, an individual; J.
REDFERN, INC., (dba "GOLDEN STATE
LANDSCAPING"), a California Corporation;
JLS PARTNERS, INC., (dba "GSL
CONSTRUCTION"), a California Corporation;
and EMPIRE LANDSCAPE
CONSTRUCTION, a California Corporation,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
Plaintiffs Marcos Vargas, Romualdo Altamirano, Pedro Ramos, Bulmaro Bazan, Marcos
16 Mandujano, Jose Solis, Luis Pena, Benito Chairez, Figueroa, Fredy Rocha, Salvador Flores,
17 Ismael Corona, Epigmenio Lopez, Juan Corona, Enrique Tamayo, Francisco Salgado, Silverio
18 Torres, Martin Ramos Ramirez, Angel Sanchez, Eron Lopez, Eduardo Vargas, Jorge Soto,
19 Rigoberto Sanchez, Julio Lopez, Jose J. Garcia, Pedro Sierra, Damacio Sanchez, Juan Guerra,
20 Jaime Martinez Jr., Robert Montoya, Mateo Guzman, Lazaro Maya, Jose Estrada, Aniceto
21 Almanza Sanchez, Emilio Vargas, Jose Antonio Alvarez, Antonio Rodriguez, Joseph Renee
22 Rodriguez, Mauricio Sanchez, Mauricio Sanchez Arzate, Manuel Renteria, Miguel Suchil
23 Mendoza, and Vicente Martinez, (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants John Earl Redfern, J.
24 Redfern, Inc. (dba Golden State Landscaping), JLS Partners, Inc. (dba GSL Construction), and
25 Empire Landscape Construction (collectively “Defendants”) agree and stipulate, through their
26 respective counsel, to the following extension:
27
1.
The parties have finalized and signed settlement agreements for both the related
28 state court matter (Jose Moreno et al v. J. Redfern, Inc. et al., Alameda Co. Superior Court Case
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT
1 No. RG08375539) and this matter.
2
2.
The parties have made request for dismissal in this matter contingent upon the
3 state court granting final approval of the proposed settlement in the Moreno action. Per the
4 settlement agreement in this matter, Plaintiffs agree to deliver to counsel for Defendants a fully
5 executed Request for Dismissal within five (5) calendar days of the date on which the Alameda
6 Superior Court grant final approval of the proposed settlement in the Moreno matter.
7
3.
The proposed class action settlement in the Moreno matter was granted
8 preliminary approval by Judge Robert Freeman of the Alameda Superior Court on December 20,
9 2014.
10
4.
The Final Approval Hearing in the Moreno matter has been set for April 25, 2014.
11
5.
As such, the parties have agreed to continue the deadline for Defendants’
12 responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ complaint from January 16, 2014 to May 27, 2014.
13
6.
The parties also request that the initial Case Management Conference in this
14 matter be continued from February 7, 2014 to June 13, 2014.
15
16
Dated: January __, 2014
/s/ Joseph D. Sutton
LAW OFFICES OF MALLISON &
MARTINEZ
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
19
20
21
22
Dated: January __, 2014
/s/ Marlene Muraco
23
LITTLER MENDELSON
A Professional Corporation
24
Attorneys for Defendants
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT
1
2
ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES AND FOR GOOD CAUSE
3 APPEARING, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS:
4
1.
That the deadline for Defendants’ responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ complaint be
5 continued from January 16, 2014 to May 27, 2014.
6
2.
That the initial Case Management Conference in this matter be continued from
7 February 7, 2014 to June 13, 2014.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
S
R NIA
United States District CourtyJudge
er
R. Bre
Charles
Judge
FO
ER
H
15
O
The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
RT
14
O
IT IS S
NO
13
D
_________________________________
RDERE
LI
12
Dated: January 31, 2014
A
11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
10
UNIT
ED
9
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?