McBride et al v. First California Mortgage Company et al

Filing 12

ORDER by Judge Seeborg Re 11 Motion for TRO (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2012)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

5
6

GREGORY S. MCBRIDE and
CONCETTA MCBRIDE,

No. C 12-04054 RS

7
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

FIRST CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE
COMPANY; LUMINENT MORTGAGE
LOAN TRUST 2006-6; HSBC BANK, N.A.;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS (“MERS”);
AURORA SERVICING COMPANY, and
DOES 1-20, Inclusive, et al.,

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER RE: EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE

13
14

Defendants.
____________________________________/

15
16

In this recently filed mortgage foreclosure action, plaintiffs Gregory and Concetta McBride

17

apply, on an ex parte basis, for a temporary restraining order (TRO), or an order to show cause as to

18

why a preliminary injunction should not issue. Specifically, plaintiffs request a restraining order

19

against defendants enjoining them from transferring ownership of or further encumbering the

20

property at issue, 471 Monterey Salinas Hwy, Salinas, California 93908. Because plaintiffs’

21

application does not represent that the threatened foreclosure sale is imminent, defendants may, if

22

they so elect, file an opposition brief of up to five typed pages (excluding exhibits and supporting

23

materials) by 5pm on Tuesday September 18, 2012. Absent further Court order, the request will

24

then be adjudicated without a hearing, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 7-1(b).

25

IT IS SO ORDERED

26
27
28

Dated: 9/17/12
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NO. C 11-03079 RS
ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. C 11-03079 RS
ORDER

2